<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
</head>
<body>
<p>Rather more importantly the Wuhan lab leak theory was treated as
blatant disinformation. It was punishable on multiple platforms
to say you thought it was the most likely explanation, even if you
were well credentialed and presented a thorough case. Fauci and
US government pushed such punishment as appropriate and are still
pushing to punish and censor misinformation and disinformation.
Determined by whom? Why, primarily by government of course.
Because they need to product us from wrong think. <br/>
</p>
<p>- samantha <br/>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/18/24 09:06, spike jones via
extropy-chat wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:046001da4a28$42a46bf0$c7ed43d0$@rainier66.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"/>
<style>@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. Fauci has testified before a House
subcommittee that the lab leak of Covid19 is not a conspiracy
theory.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I want to know how he figures is isn’t. It
IS a conspiracy theory. Just because a theory turns out to be
true, it is still referred to as a theory. Examples: theory
of evolution, relativity theory and so on. So even if it is
proven that covid19 escaped from the Wuhan Institute of
Virology, which it will never be, for the Chinese have
destroyed the evidence, it is still a theory. Even if the
overwhelming consensus among scientists agree on that origin,
it remains a theory.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There appears to have been some unethical
practices involved in discrediting that theory. The Chinese
destroying the evidence and restricting access to those
survivors who were there. Dr. Fauci working with and choosing
scientists to write the article for Nature Medicine, Dr.
Collins the others, would constitute a conspiracy, ja? They
worked together to discredit a plausible theory, which is a
conspiracy.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So… as has been demonstrated repeatedly,
just because a notion is a conspiracy theory does not prove it
is not true. The definition has changed: conspiracy theories
might be true. Even if it is true, the lab leak origin of
Covid19 is now and will forever be a conspiracy theory.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">spike<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>