<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>I get suspicious when I see stock price graphs that look like this one:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><a href="https://stockanalysis.com/quote/otc/ARRNF/">https://stockanalysis.com/quote/otc/ARRNF/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>This company might have put out a phony story about finding a coupla billion tons of REEs, considering the flatly false comment in the second paragraph “…2.34 billion metric tons of some of the rarest materials on earth…” Nah, they aren’t rare materials. They are rarely refined however, but that’s different. We have the ore, that stuff isn’t rare at all. You can be sure that while the price is up and the EPA is on vacation, they will be getting unconditional irrevocable three-year waivers to set up refining facilities.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Good chance the stockholders came up with the idea, raced up the price of the stock, started dumping it when the price hit 65, investors noticed and followed suit, dumping their stock too. Settled back to reasonable numbers.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>There are some other howlers in that article: “… ushering in a potential 80 trillion dollar opportunity by 2030…” eh, no. Do let me assure you, that won’t happen. It would be nice if it does however: that would get us toward John’s vision of unimaginable wealth. I have a pretty good imagination when it comes to unimaginable wealth. I could achieve Simon bar Sinister’s vision, and rule the world. Either rule the world, or a nice fast comfortable car, one of those would be good.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Playing in the ideas futures game trains the mind in spotting bullshit. Stock holders will put stuff in the comment section designed to influence others to buy his stock at a high price or sell him theirs at a low one. This American Rare Earth nonsense was very easy to spot. In general, playing for money on future memes is good for the brain.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>spike<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>