<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Adrian, Jason and John have had a long discussion on this subject.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">I asked Kimi K2 Thinking AI to summarise the differences between these theories.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">(Hoping to add some clarification).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">BillK</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">-------------</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Kimi K2 Thinking AI -</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Here’s a detailed breakdown of why most physicists prefer the Many 
Worlds Interpretation (MWI) over superdeterminism, despite both being 
deterministic theories:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">Click the link to view the complete summary <<a href="https://www.kimi.com/share/19a6fcce-a8a2-8623-8000-0000e0a140f6" target="_blank">https://www.kimi.com/share/19a6fcce-a8a2-8623-8000-0000e0a140f6</a>></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br>## Bottom Line: The Consensus Preference<br><br>MWI is preferred because:<br>1. **Preserves statistical independence** (the bedrock of experimental science)<br>2. **Avoids cosmic conspiracy** (no need for fine-tuned initial conditions)<br>3. **Accepts only "tame" non-locality** (no faster-than-light causation)<br>4. **Maintains scientific method** (experiments test real hypotheses)<br>5. **More parsimonious** (uses existing mathematical structure)<br><br>Superdeterminism, by contrast, is seen as a **desperate loophole** that "undercuts the whole scientific method"  to avoid admitting quantum non-locality. While not definitively disproven, its cost to scientific epistemology is considered too high</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">--------------------------</div></div>
</div>
</div>