<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 10:16 AM <<a href="mailto:spike@rainier66.com">spike@rainier66.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-8126050964070142784"><div lang="EN-US" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;"><div class="m_-8126050964070142784WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u> </span></p><div><div><blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="m_-8126050964070142784gmaildefault"><i><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">>></span> </span></i></span><i><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">The NYTimes has a lingering credibility problem for its handling of the Russia collusion story, and subsequently receiving the Pulitzer prize in 2018 for a story it later had to partially retract.</span></i><u></u><u></u></p></blockquote><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">></span>…That statement is factually incorrect, The New York Times did <span class="m_-8126050964070142784gmaildefault"><u>NOT</u> </span>retract <u>any part</u> of the stories that it won the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for….<span class="m_-8126050964070142784gmaildefault"> John K Clark</span></span></b><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><i><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">> </span>T<span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"></span>hat is quite the admission John.  Or accusation of the NYTimes.  Which?  Take it up with this guy:</i><b><u></u><u></u></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><a href="https://jonathanturley.org/2019/01/11/new-york-times-issues-retraction-in-bombshell-collusion-story/" target="_blank">https://jonathanturley.org/2019/01/11/new-york-times-issues-retraction-in-bombshell-collusion-story/</a></span></b></p></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b> That's not what the New York Times won the Pulitzer Prize for.<span class="gmail_default" style=""> And when was the last time right wing media has ever admitted they made a mistake? Are you claiming that they have never made a mistake? </span></b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b><span class="gmail_default" style=""><br></span></b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b><span class="gmail_default" style="">John</span></b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b><span class="gmail_default" style=""><br></span></b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b><span class="gmail_default" style=""><br></span></b></font></div></div></div>