<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 9:52 AM spike jones via extropy-chat <<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>> wrote:</span></div></div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="font-size:18.6667px"><i style=""><font face="georgia, serif"><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">> </span>If one of the mainstream candidates fully embraced the LP platform, the PL would not know what to do.</font></i></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b>Based on their history I think the <span class="gmail_default" style="">L</span>ibertarian <span class="gmail_default" style="">P</span>arty <span class="gmail_default" style="">members </span>would know exactly what to do</b></font><span class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b style=""> under those circumstances, they would continue to promote their own candidate and do everything they could think of to split the libertarian vote; that's how we ended up with the most anti-libertarian president since the founding of the country. </b></font></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b style=""><br></b></font></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><b style="">John K Clark</b></font></span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg7035474730022166020"><br>
</div></blockquote></div></div>