<div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jun 5, 2026, 11:08 AM  <<a href="mailto:spike@rainier66.com">spike@rainier66.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word"><div class="m_505142751028748993WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">>…Or, in short: the evidence shows that POTUS has been spending taxpayer dollars.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Solution: congress should refuse to authorize the spending.  Done.</span></p></div></div></blockquote></div><div dir="auto">That doesn't prevent POTUS from spending anyway, regardless of lack of Congressional authorization.  The courts eventually, sometimes do, but this is an imperfect solution that still allows a lot of damage to be done before they can rule on individual cases.</div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir="auto"></div><div dir="auto"></div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir="auto"></div></div>