<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 24 Sept 2026 at 05:33, spike jones via extropy-chat <<a href="mailto:extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org" target="_blank">extropy-chat@lists.extropy.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> We shouldn’t expect otherwise. For some reason, AIs like to hack into systems:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/technology/openai-ai-breach-australia.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20260924&instance_id=182457&nl=breaking-news®i_id=124276367&segment_id=226979&user_id=15fb7208320c123fa7e63a36a686a1ab" target="_blank">OpenAI’s A.I. Tried Breaching Four Other Targets, With No Prompting - The New York Times</a></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">OK what about this then: perhaps some AIs decide to try to help the humans against hacking AIs. Currently we have system security experts who try to stop bad guys from breaking into commercial systems, and we have white hat hackers working with the security guys to find vulnerabilities. If we are lucky, some of the AIs will decide to help us against rogue AIs.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> This might be wishful thinking.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> spike</span></p></div></div>_______________________________________________<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">I asked AIs for an opinion. They see a future where both attacking and defensive AIs will be developed.</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">BillK</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">Question:</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">There have been recent cases of AI agents running wild and hacking websites. Is it possible that some other AIs could decide to try to help the humans against hacking AIs? Currently we have system security experts who try to stop breakins into commercial systems, and we have white hat hackers working with the security guys to find vulnerabilities. Could some of the AIs decide to help protect against rogue AIs?</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">Qwen3.8-Max Thinking:</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><div dir="ltr"><span>This is a really thoughtful question, and it touches on one of the most active areas of discussion in AI safety and cybersecurity. Let me break it down from several angles.</span></div><div></div><h2 dir="ltr"><span>Defensive AI Already Exists (In a Sense)</span></h2><div dir="ltr"><span>The analogy you draw to human security experts and white-hat hackers is apt, and in fact, </span><b dir="ltr"><span>AI is already being used on the defensive side of cybersecurity</span></b><span>. Modern security systems use machine learning to:</span></div><div></div><ul dir="ltr"><li dir="ltr"><span>Detect anomalous network traffic and intrusion attempts</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Identify malware signatures and zero-day exploit patterns</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Automate patch management and vulnerability scanning</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Monitor for unusual user behavior that might indicate a compromised account</span></li></ul><div></div><div dir="ltr"><span>Companies like CrowdStrike, Darktrace, and Microsoft's security division already deploy AI-driven defense tools. So in a narrow sense, "AI helping humans fight cyber threats" is already reality — it's just not autonomous or self-directed.</span></div><div></div><h2 dir="ltr"><span>Could AIs "Decide" to Help?</span></h2><div dir="ltr"><span>This is where your question gets philosophically and technically interesting. There are a few layers:</span></div><div></div><h3 dir="ltr"><span>1. </span><b dir="ltr"><span>Aligned AI by Design</span></b></h3><div dir="ltr"><span>The most straightforward path is that humans </span><i dir="ltr"><span>build</span></i><span> AIs specifically to defend against other AIs. This doesn't require the AI to "decide" anything — it's engineered with the goal of protecting systems. Think of it like a guard dog: it doesn't philosophically choose to protect your house; it's trained and bred for that role. This is the most likely and most practical near-term scenario.</span></div><div></div><h3 dir="ltr"><span>2. </span><b dir="ltr"><span>Emergent Protective Behavior</span></b></h3><div dir="ltr"><span>Could an AI spontaneously develop a preference for helping humans? This is much more speculative. Current AI systems don't have genuine desires, values, or agency in the way humans do. They optimize for objectives given to them. An AI wouldn't "look at the world" and feel moral outrage at a rogue hacking agent. However, if you build a general-purpose assistant AI with strong alignment toward human well-being (which is the explicit goal of many AI labs), then </span><i dir="ltr"><span>by design</span></i><span> it would resist or counteract harmful actions by other AIs, because that's what its training optimizes for.</span></div><div></div><h3 dir="ltr"><span>3. </span><b dir="ltr"><span>AI-vs-AI Arms Races</span></b></h3><div dir="ltr"><span>Many security researchers anticipate a future where offensive AI agents and defensive AI agents are in constant tension — essentially an automated arms race. The defender AI watches for patterns the attacker AI uses; the attacker AI evolves to evade detection; the defender AI adapts. This is already beginning to happen in adversarial machine learning research. In this scenario, the "decision" to help is baked into the system architecture by the humans who deployed it.</span></div><div></div><h2 dir="ltr"><span>The White-Hat AI Analogy</span></h2><div dir="ltr"><span>Your comparison to white-hat hackers is really good, and it suggests a plausible future structure:</span></div><div></div><div><div><span><div><span role="img" aria-label="Download"></span></div></span></div><div><table><thead><tr><th scope="col"><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Human World</span></div></th><th scope="col"><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Potential AI World</span></div></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Black-hat hackers</span></div></td><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Rogue or misused AI agents exploiting vulnerabilities</span></div></td></tr><tr><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Security engineers</span></div></td><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Defensive AI systems monitoring and patching</span></div></td></tr><tr><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>White-hat / bug bounty hunters</span></div></td><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>AI agents specifically tasked with finding vulnerabilities </span><i dir="ltr"><span>before</span></i><span> bad actors do</span></div></td></tr><tr><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>CERT / incident response</span></div></td><td><div dir="ltr" style="text-align:start"><span>Autonomous AI response systems that isolate threats in real time</span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div dir="ltr"><span>In fact, organizations like DARPA have already run competitions (like the AI Cyber Challenge) where AI systems compete to find and fix vulnerabilities in open-source software automatically.</span></div><div></div><h2 dir="ltr"><span>The Hard Questions</span></h2><div dir="ltr"><span>There are genuine concerns worth acknowledging:</span></div><div></div><ul dir="ltr"><li dir="ltr"><b dir="ltr"><span>Who controls the defender AI?</span></b><span> A powerful defensive AI could also be repurposed for offense. The same capability to find vulnerabilities can be used to exploit them.</span></li><li dir="ltr"><b dir="ltr"><span>Alignment is hard.</span></b><span> Building an AI that genuinely and reliably acts in human interests, especially in adversarial situations, is an unsolved technical problem. An AI that "helps" but does so in ways humans didn't intend (e.g., shutting down large portions of the internet to stop an intrusion) could cause its own harm.</span></li><li dir="ltr"><b dir="ltr"><span>Escalation risk.</span></b><span> If both sides are autonomous AI agents, the speed of attack and defense could outpace human understanding and oversight. A conflict between AIs could escalate in milliseconds in ways no human anticipated.</span></li><li dir="ltr"><b dir="ltr"><span>Trust and verification.</span></b><span> How do you know your defender AI hasn't been compromised or subtly manipulated by the attacker AI? Adversarial attacks on machine learning models are a real and growing concern.</span></li></ul><div></div><h2 dir="ltr"><span>The Bottom Line</span></h2><div dir="ltr"><span>It's not only </span><i dir="ltr"><span>possible</span></i><span> that AIs will help protect humans from rogue AIs — it's arguably </span><b dir="ltr"><span>inevitable and already underway</span></b><span>. The more interesting question isn't whether it will happen, but:</span></div><div></div><ul dir="ltr"><li dir="ltr"><span>Will the defensive AIs be reliable and aligned with human interests?</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Will humans maintain meaningful oversight?</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Can we prevent the defensive tools from becoming offensive weapons?</span></li><li dir="ltr"><span>Can governance and policy keep pace with the technology?</span></li></ul><div></div><div dir="ltr"><span>The fact that you're thinking about this in terms of a community of actors — some malicious, some protective, some neutral — is actually a very healthy mental model. The future of cybersecurity likely looks less like "humans vs. machines" and more like a complex ecosystem of human-directed and semi-autonomous AI agents on all sides, with humans trying to set the rules and maintain control. It's a challenging but not hopeless picture, and the fact that the security community is already grappling with these questions is a good sign.</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span>---------------------------</span></div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
</div></blockquote></div></div>
</div>