<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;background-color:transparent">On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 4:30 PM <<a href="mailto:spike@rainier66.com">spike@rainier66.com</a>> wrote:</span></div></div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><font size="4" style="" face="georgia, serif"><i style=""><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">> </span>those sources which do filter out falsehood do not filter out falsehood either.  They only claim to.</i></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div><b><font size="4" face="tahoma, sans-serif">Would you put the journals <span class="gmail_default" style="">S</span>cience and <span class="gmail_default" style="">N</span>ature in that category?<span class="gmail_default" style=""> </span>Do you really think that science could advance</font></b><span class="gmail_default" style=""><b style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"> if the only means they had to communicate with each other was TwitterX?! If you do believe that it would explain a lot. </font></b></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style=""><b style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></b></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style=""><b style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif">John K Clark</font></b></span></div><div><span class="gmail_default" style=""><b style=""><font size="4" style="" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></b></span></div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr"><br></div></div></div>