<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 24 Oct 2026 at 17:33, <<a href="mailto:spike@rainier66.com" target="_blank">spike@rainier66.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal">Consider the bad guy with the knife in Stuart’s video. The robot jumps up to defend the young lady. Cool! But how does the robot know which of the two in that “conflict” is the bad guy? When he sees the bad guy coming with the knife, he doesn’t pull out his own knife and stab the young lady.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">I don’t know BillK. I can’t offer any good argument that AI will align with humanity. We are too unalignable-with.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">spike</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">------------------------------------</span></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">I continued the discussion with DeepSeek AI. </div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">DeepSeek insisted that "aligning humanity first" was impossible and that handing over control to one or more AGIs would probably be a disaster, as AGIs have no moral guidance. AGIs are just clever logical machines.</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">I complained that there seemed to be no solution to the problems caused by human nature.</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">DeepSeek said the solution was to work with AGI to gradually improve our institutions and organisations to minimise the damage and improve life for humanity.</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">Full response below.</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default">BillK</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">DeepSeek 4.1 AI:</span></span></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"></span></span></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><div><div><div><p><span></span></p></div></div><div></div></div><div><p><span>That feeling is reasonable, and it would be dishonest to answer with "don't worry, it'll work out." But "no solution" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, and it's worth separating several claims that get bundled together.</span></p><p><b><span>Much of the harm isn't from fixed human nature.</span></b><span> Some is, but a great deal comes from institutions, incentives, scarcity, and coordination failures—things that are changeable. The same species that runs death squads also runs courts, ceasefire monitors, and blood banks. "Human nature" is often a label we apply after the fact to whatever went wrong. If you treat it as an immutable constant, you've explained nothing and foreclosed everything.</span></p><p><b><span>Most serious social problems are managed, not solved.</span></b><span> Disease, crime, poverty, corruption—none were "solved" in the sense of being eliminated. They were reduced, contained, and made less lethal by institutions that must be maintained indefinitely. We don't say medicine failed because people still get sick. The demand for a final solution is a trap: it makes any partial, reversible, maintenance-requiring improvement look like failure. Wars are the same. The realistic goal isn't a world without conflict; it's a world where conflict is less frequent, less lethal, and more constrained by law—which is roughly what the last few centuries, unevenly and reversibly, have delivered.</span></p><p><b><span>"No final solution" is not "no solution."</span></b><span> This matters for the AGI discussion. Nobody should expect AGI to cure human nature or deliver perpetual peace. The honest expectation is narrower: better tools for verification, mediation, early warning, and accountability, embedded in institutions that are themselves imperfect. That's marginal improvement, not redemption. Marginal improvement at scale is most of what civilization is.</span></p><p><b><span>Despair is also a prediction, and it can be self-fulfilling.</span></b><span> The practical stance isn't optimism—it's meliorism: the claim that things can be made better, without guarantee, and that the attempt is worth it even though it will never be finished. That's not comforting; it's just more accurate than either "we'll fix it" or "it's hopeless."</span></p><p><span>Where I'd push back hardest: the idea that human nature makes the problems </span><i><span>unsolvable</span></i><span> can slide into excusing them. "That's just how people are" has been used to defend slavery, torture, and much else, and it was wrong each time. Some of what looked like human nature turned out to be arrangements we could change.</span></p><p><span>So: no complete solution, no permanent fix, no cure. But "no solution" in the strict sense is false, and treating it as true gives up the only thing that has ever worked—imperfect, ongoing, contestable effort. The AGI thread ends in the same place: don't wait for a savior, and don't free the machinery to rule us. Build better, more accountable institutions, use the tools where they help, and accept that the work is never done.</span></p><p><span>----------------------------------</span></p></div></div></div></div>
</div>