[Paleopsych] Re: Disinfopedia

Geraldine Reinhardt waluk at earthlink.net
Sun Nov 28 03:01:09 UTC 2004


If you substitute the word viewpoint for prejudice, 
your sentence below should make more sense.

My question concerned the initiation of a one-party 
system.  Apparently you disapprove of such a setup. 
Please explain.

Gerry
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~waluk

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Hovland" <shovland at mindspring.com>
To: "'The new improved paleopsych list'" 
<paleopsych at paleopsych.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Paleopsych] Re: Disinfopedia


> We all tend to think that sources that reflect
> our own prejudices are objective.
>
> A lot of liberals listen to right wing media.
>
> How many conservatives listen to Air America?
>
> Steve Hovland
> www.stevehovland.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geraldine  Reinhardt [SMTP:waluk at earthlink.net]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:19 PM
> To: The new improved paleopsych list
> Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: Disinfopedia
>
>>>This looks like a very useful site.  But there's a 
>>>conundrum.  The Center
> For Media and Democracy is a special interest group 
> with a prejudged and
> premeditated point of view.  It's also a public 
> relations machine.  A
> successful one. >>
>
> Howard,
>
> CMD staff members Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber 
> have finished writing
> their fifth book, Banana Republicans: How the Right 
> Wing Is Turning America
> Into a One-Party State. It's now in bookstores, or 
> you can order it online.
> You can also find chapter summaries, an excerpt, and 
> reviews of the book on
> our new Banana Republicans website.
>
> Are those who wish to turn America into a One-Party 
> State considered
> "undemocratic".  Or un-bananarepublican?  After a 
> "skim" at election
> results worldwide it would appear that initiating a 
> one party system (for
> the present time) is not an unacceptable idea.  Could 
> you explain your
> calling The Center For Media and Democracy a 
> prejudged and premeditated
> group?  Is it only because they supported the 
> Hutu-Tutsi conflict?
> Presently I have very few bones to pick with The 
> Center.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gerry
>
>
>
>
>
>
> << File: ATT00000.html >>  << File: ATT00001.txt >>
> _______________________________________________
> paleopsych mailing list
> paleopsych at paleopsych.org
> http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
> 





More information about the paleopsych mailing list