[Paleopsych] The Observer: Revealed: full scale of euthanasia in Britain

Premise Checker checker at panix.com
Tue Sep 21 15:20:41 UTC 2004

Revealed: full scale of euthanasia in Britain
Fury as number of 'assisted deaths' claimed to be 18,000
Jamie Doward, social affairs editor
Sunday September 19 2004
The Observer
[Thanks to Adelaide for finding this article.]

British doctors help nearly 20,000 people a year to die, according to one 
of the UK's leading authorities on euthanasia. The claim, the first public 
attempt by a credible expert to put a figure on 'assisted dying' rates, 
will reignite the emotive debate over the practice.

Dr Hazel Biggs, director of medical law at the University of Kent and 
author of Euthanasia: Death with Dignity and the Law, calculates that at 
least 18,000 people a year are helped to die by doctors who are treating 
them for terminal illnesses.

Biggs, who has submitted evidence to the House of Lords select committee 
which is examining Lord Joffe's private member's bill on Assisted Dying 
for the Terminally Ill, makes the claim in an article submitted to the 
European Journal for Health Law .

Her figures will place renewed focus on the doctor-patient relationship, 
which pro-euthanasia campaigners want changed so that medical staff can 
help conscious, terminally ill patients in pain to shorten their lives.

Biggs's figures are based on data from countries such as the Netherlands 
and Australia, which have published research into assisted dying rates, as 
well as evidence taken from British doctors.

'If you extrapolate from countries that have published data, you're 
looking at quite a large number of patients who may have had their end 
hastened, not necessarily with their consent,' she said.

'What this says to me is that we know these practices are going on, but 
they are completely unregulated. We don't know how many people are 
volunteers or non-volunteers, and maybe because of that the law ought to 
be changed so that people can give voluntary consent, which will give them 
more protection.'

An ageing population has meant that an increasing number of doctors are 
taking private decisions to aid the early demise of terminally ill 
patients, usually by increasing drug doses.

Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the Voluntary Euthanasia Society, said 
there was an urgent need to clarify regulations governing assisted dying: 
'We need to shine a spotlight on this. The medical profession doesn't want 
the public to realise they are making these decisions. It shows the need 
to make the patient the decision-maker. When it's left to the doctor, 
there is always the risk of abuse.'

Pro-euthansia groups point out that in Britain the maximum sentence for 
helping someone to commit suicide is 14 years in prison. 'With the 
exception of Ireland, no other country in Europe behaves like that,' 
Annetts said.

Opinion polls show overwhelming public support for law changes that would 
make it easier for terminally ill patients in pain to request medical help 
to shorten their lives. In successive surveys, about 80 per cent of people 
back the move. A survey by the society this month found that 47 per cent 
of people said they were prepared to help a loved one to die, even if it 
meant breaking the law.

But a spokeswoman for the ProLife party said: 'Surely the response of a 
compassionate society is to alleviate the pain, to love and comfort the 
patient, and to try and restore a sense of self-worth until death comes 

Politicians have repeatedly deflected moves to change the law on 
euthanasia, believing it is unlikely to be a vote-winner. But Joffe's bill 
might find its way through the Lords committee stage and into the Commons, 
which would alarm religious groups.

In a joint submission to the select committee, Church of England and Roman 
Catholic bishops said: 'It is deeply misguided to propose a law by which 
it would be legal for terminally ill people to be killed or assisted in 
suicide by those caring for them, even if there are safeguards to ensure 
that only the terminally ill would qualify.'

More information about the paleopsych mailing list