[Paleopsych] Newsweek: Blogging Beyond the Men's Club
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Fri Apr 8 19:12:00 UTC 2005
Blogging Beyond the Men's Club
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7160264/site/newsweek/
Since anyone can write a Weblog, why is the blogosphere dominated by
white males?
By Steven Levy
Senior Editor
Newsweek
March 21 issue - At a recent Harvard conference on bloggers and the
media, the most pungent statement came from cyberspace. Rebecca
MacKinnon, writing about the conference as it happened, got a response
on the "comments" space of her blog from someone concerned that if the
voices of bloggers overwhelm those of traditional media, "we will
throw out some of the best ... journalism of the 21st century." The
comment was from Keith Jenkins, an African-American blogger who is
also an editor at The Washington Post Magazine [a sister publication
of NEWSWEEK]. "It has taken 'mainstream media' a very long time to get
to [the] point of inclusion," Jenkins wrote. "My fear is that the
overwhelmingly white and male American blogosphere ... will return us
to a day where the dialogue about issues was a predominantly
white-only one."
After the comment was posted, a couple of the women at the
conference--bloggers MacKinnon and Halley Suitt--looked around and saw
that there weren't many other women in attendance. Nor were the faces
yapping about the failings of Big Media representative of the human
quiltwork one would see in the streets of Cambridge or New York City,
let alone overseas. They were, however, representative of the top 100
blogs according to the Web site Technorati--a list dominated by
bigmouths of the white-male variety.
Does the blogosphere have a diversity problem?
Viewed one way, the issue seems a bit absurd. These self-generated
personal Web sites are supposed to be the ultimate grass-roots
phenomenon. The perks of alpha bloggers--voluminous traffic, links
from other bigfeet, conference invitations, White House press
passes--are, in theory, bequeathed by a market-driven merit system.
The idea is that the smartest, the wittiest and the most industrious
in finding good stuff will simply rise to the top, by virtue of a
self-organizing selection process.
So why, when millions of blogs are written by all sorts of people,
does the top rung look so homogeneous? It appears that some clubbiness
is involved. Suitt puts it more bluntly: "It's white people linking to
other white people!" (A link from a popular blog is this medium's
equivalent to a Super Bowl ad.) Suitt attributes her own high status
in the blogging world to her conscious decision to "promote myself
among those on the A list."
Coincidentally, this issue arises just as a related controversy is
raising eyebrows in mainstream media. Law professor Susan Estrich has
been hammering Michael Kinsley, the editorial-page editor of the Los
Angeles Times, for not running a sufficient number of op-ed pieces by
women and minorities. Though the e-mail exchange between the two
deteriorated into a spitting match, both agreed that extra care is
required to make sure public discussion reflects the actual
population.
The top-down mainstream media have to some degree found the will and
the means to administer such care. But is there a way to promote
diversity online, given the built-in decentralization of the blog
world? Jenkins, whose comment started the discussion, says that any
approach is fine--except inaction. "You can't wait for it to just
happen," he says. Appropriately enough, the best ideas rely on
individual choices. MacKinnon is involved in a project called Global
Voices, to highlight bloggers from around the world. And at the
Harvard conference, Suitt challenged people to each find 10 bloggers
who weren't male, white or English-speaking--and link to them. "Don't
you think," she says, "that out of 8 million blogs, there could be 50
new voices worth hearing?" Definitely. Now let's see if the
blogosphere can self-organize itself to find them.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list