[Paleopsych] CSM: New research opens a window on the minds of plants
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sun Apr 17 17:01:30 UTC 2005
New research opens a window on the minds of plants
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0303/p01s03-usgn.htm
5.3.5
By Patrik Jonsson | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
RALEIGH, N.C. - Hardly articulate, the tiny strangleweed, a pale
parasitic plant, can sense the presence of friends, foes, and food,
and make adroit decisions on how to approach them.
Mustard weed, a common plant with a six-week life cycle, can't find
its way in the world if its root-tip statolith - a starchy "brain"
that communicates with the rest of the plant - is cut off.
The ground-hugging mayapple plans its growth two years into the
future, based on computations of weather patterns. And many who visit
the redwoods of the Northwest come away awed by the trees' survival
for millenniums - a journey that, for some trees, precedes the
Parthenon.
As trowel-wielding scientists dig up a trove of new findings, even
those skeptical of the evolving paradigm of "plant intelligence"
acknowledge that, down to the simplest magnolia or fern, flora have
the smarts of the forest. Some scientists say they carefully consider
their environment, speculate on the future, conquer territory and
enemies, and are often capable of forethought - revelations that could
affect everyone from gardeners to philosophers.
Indeed, extraordinary new findings on how plants investigate and
respond to their environments are part of a sprouting debate over the
nature of intelligence itself.
"The attitude of people is changing quite substantially," says Anthony
Trewavas, a plant
biochemist at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and a prominent
scholar of plant intelligence. "The idea of intelligence is going from
the very narrow view that it's just human to something that's much
more generally found in life."
To be sure, there are no signs of Socratic logic or Shakespearean
thought, and the subject of plant "brains" has sparked heated
exchanges at botany conferences. Plants, skeptics scoff, surely don't
fall in love, bake soufflés, or ponder poetry. And can a simple
reaction to one's environment truly qualify as active, intentional
reasoning?
But the late Nobel Prize-winning plant geneticist Barbara McClintock
called plant cells "thoughtful." Darwin wrote about root-tip "brains."
Not only can plants communicate with each other and with insects by
coded gas exhalations, scientists say now, they can perform Euclidean
geometry calculations through cellular computations and, like a peeved
boss, remember the tiniest transgression for months.
To a growing number of biologists, the fact that plants are now known
to challenge and exert power over other species is proof of a basic
intellect.
"If intelligence is the capacity to acquire and apply knowledge, then,
absolutely, plants are intelligent," agrees Leslie Sieburth, a
biologist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.
For philosophers, one of the key findings is that two cuttings, or
clones, taken from the same "mother plant" behave differently even
when planted in identical conditions.
"We now know there's an ability of self-recognition in plants, which
is highly unusual and quite extraordinary that it's actually there,"
says Dr. Trewavas. "But why has no one come to grips with it? Because
the prevailing view of a plant, even among plant biologists, is that
it's a simple organism that grows reproducibly in a flower pot."
But here at the labs on the North Carolina State campus, where
fluorescent grow-rooms hold genetic secrets and laser microscopes
parse the inner workings of live plants, there is still skepticism
about the ability of ordinary houseplants to intellectualize their
environment.
Most plant biologists are still looking at the mysteries of "signal
transduction," or how genetic, chemical, and hormonal orders are
dispersed for complex plant behavior. But skeptics say it's less a
product of intelligence than mechanical directives, more genetic than
genius. Some see the attribution of intelligence to plants as relative
- an oversimplification of a complex human trait.
And despite intensifying research, exactly how a plant's complex
orders are formulated and carried out remains draped in leafy mystery.
"There is still much that we do not know about how plants work, but a
big part of intelligence is self-consciousness, and plants do not have
that," says Heike Winter Sederoff, a plant biologist at N.C. State.
Still, a new NASA grant awarded to the university to study
gravitational effects on crop plants came in part due to new findings
that plants have neurotransmitters very similar to humans' - capable,
perhaps, of offering clues on how gravity affects more sentient
beings. The National Science Foundation has awarded a $5 million
research grant to pinpoint the molecular clockwork by which plants
know when to grow and when to flower.
The new field of plant neurobiology holds its first conference - The
First Symposium on Plant Neurobiology - in May in Florence, Italy.
The debate is rapidly moving past the theoretical. In space, "smart
plants" can provide not only food, oxygen, and clean air, but also
valuable companionship for lonely space travelers, say some - a boon
for astronauts if America is to go to Mars. Research on the workings
of the mustard weed's statolith, for example, may one day yield a corn
crop with 1-3/8 the gravitational force of Earth.
Some Earth-bound farmers, meanwhile, see the possibility of
communicating with plants to time waterings for ultimate growth. A new
gene, Bypass-1, found by University of Utah researchers, may make that
possible.
Still, it can be hard for the common houseplant to command respect -
even among those who study it most closely.
"When I was a postdoc, I had a neighbor who watched me buy plants,
forget to water them, and throw them out, buy them and throw them
out," says Dr. Sieburth. "When she found out I had a PhD in botany, I
thought she was going to die."
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list