[Paleopsych] BH: (Rushton) Social Responsibility in the Genes
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Wed Feb 2 22:09:33 UTC 2005
Social Responsibility in the Genes
http://www.betterhumans.com/Print/index.aspx?ArticleID=2005-01-06-1
Twin study suggests that DNA accounts for more than 40% of difference in
such behaviors as charitable giving
Betterhumans Staff
1/6/2005 1:10 PM
Genes may account for more than 40% of such charitable behavior as the
massive outpouring of donations following the recent South Asian
tsunamis.
A study comparing the social responsibility of identical and
non-identical twins showed that genes account for 42% of individual
differences in attitudes while common environment accounts for 23% and
other factors account for the remainder.
Conducted by Canadian researcher [8]J. Philippe Rushton of the
[9]University of Western Ontario, the study also found that genes have
a stronger influence on males than females (50% to 40%) while home
upbringing has a stronger influence on females (40% to 0%), suggesting
that parents may more closely watch the behavior of daughters than of
sons.
The study involved 322 pairs of twins. Of these, 174 were identical
pairs and 148 were non-identical. If traits are more similar among
identical pairs, it suggests a stronger genetic contribution because
they share all their genes while non-identical twins share only half.
Subjects answered 22 questions such as, "I am a person people can
count on" and, "Cheating on income tax is as bad as stealing" using a
scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Answers are
known to predict such behavior as voting and volunteering. Answers
were compared to determine patterns of relationships amongst the
twins.
Most previous studies on the genetics of social behavior have looked
at antisocial behavior. The new study reinforces earlier work by
Rushton and colleagues showing that genes contribute to about half the
variance of self-reported altruism, empathy, nurturance and
aggression.
The research is reported in the [10]Proceedings of the Royal Society:
Biological Sciences ([11]read abstract).
References
8. http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushton_bio.htm
9. http://www.uwo.ca/
10. http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/proc_bio_homepage.shtml
11. http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/proc_bio_content/abstracts/rushton.html
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list