[Paleopsych] CHE: Fundamentalism and Free Will (Letters)
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Thu Feb 3 20:08:17 UTC 2005
Fundamentalism and Free Will (Letters)
The Chronicle of Higher Education, 5.1.7
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v51/i18/18a06304.htm
To the Editor:
As a person who has been intimately involved for over a decade in the
evangelical debate over the foreknowledge of God, I read [3]"Can God
See the Future?" (The Chronicle, November 26) with great interest. I
count as good friends both John E. Sanders and Bruce A. Ware, the two
theologians featured in the article, on opposite sides. I grieve over
this inquisition within the evangelical academy and hope that those
who would expel open theists will achieve a broader vision of the
evangelical tent.
The article mistakenly refers to open theists and their supporters as
"liberals" within evangelicalism. That is not the case. In fact, the
open theists interpret the Bible more literally than do their critics.
They derive their conclusions about God's foreknowledge from Scripture
and not from modern movements such as process philosophy and theology.
Furthermore, contrary to what the article implied, evangelicalism has
always included believers in free will; Calvinism is not normative for
evangelical theology. John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist
tradition (which strongly emphasizes free will), was just as
evangelical as his contemporary Jonathan Edwards, a Calvinist who
regarded God as the all-determining reality and who denied freedom of
will.
What this controversy reveals is that in spite of its own best
intentions and efforts, evangelicalism has not fully emerged from its
fundamentalist roots. The furor over open theism is a product of
latent fundamentalist habits of the mind that continue to plague many
evangelical organizations and institutions.
Roger E. Olson
Professor of Theology
Baylor University
Waco, Tex.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list