[Paleopsych] Engineering Evolution: The Alchemy of Eugenics | Phillip D. Collins

Premise Checker checker at panix.com
Thu Feb 3 20:18:29 UTC 2005

Engineering Evolution: The Alchemy of Eugenics | Phillip D. Collins

    - by Phillip D. Collins, Jan. 10th, 2005

    In the dark past of human civilization, the ruling class controlled
    humanity largely through religious institutions and mysticism.
    However, the turn of the century witnessed the epistemic
    transformation of the elite's religious power structure into a
    "scientific dictatorship." The history and background of this
    "scientific dictatorship" is a conspiracy, created and micro-managed
    through the historical tide of Darwinism, which has its foundations in
    Freemasonry. In this article, we shall examine the evolutionary
    alchemy of eugenics, from Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood to
    William Sims Bainbridge's Transhumanism.

The Alchemical Transformation of Man

    A common misnomer that has been circulated by academia's anointed
    historians is that the alchemists of antiquity were attempting to
    transform lead into gold. In truth, this was a fiction promulgated by
    the alchemists themselves to conceal their ultimate objectives . .
    .the transformation of man into a god. Among one of the various occult
    organizations that aspired to complete this alchemical mission was
    Freemasonry. Providing a summation of Masonry's supreme goal, Masonic
    scholar W.L. Wilmshurst writes:

      "This - the evolution of man into superman [emphasis - ADDED] - was
      always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose
      of modern Masonry is, not the social and charitable purposes to
      which so much attention is paid, but the expediting of the
      spiritual evolution of those who aspire to perfect their own nature
      and transform it into a more god-like quality. And this is a
      definite science, a royal art, which it is possible for each of us
      to put into practice; whilst to join the Craft for any other
      purpose than to study and pursue this science is to misunderstand
      its meaning." (Wilmshurst, p. 47, 1980)

    According to this alchemical mandate, humanity is a gradually
    developing deity requiring scientific assistance in its evolution. In
    Mystic Masonry, 32nd degree Mason J.D. Buck reiterates this theme of
    man as a progressively apotheosizing organism: "Humanity, 'in-toto',
    then, is the only Personal God" (Buck, p. 136, 1990). Of course, the
    concept of evolution would later be disseminated on the popular level
    as Darwinism and become the veritable cornerstone of contemporary

    Before its popularization, evolutionary theory was the intellectual
    property of Masonry. Freemason Erasmus Darwin, Charles' grandfather,
    "originated almost every important idea that has since appeared in
    evolutionary theory" (Darlington, p. 62, 1959). It is hardly a
    coincidence that many of Charles Darwin's chief promoters were
    Freemasons, not the least of which being T.H. Huxley. It is even less
    of a coincidence that Charles Darwin's cousin, Sir Francis Galton,
    would become one of the early expediters of Masonry's alchemical

Eugenics: Alchemically Engineered Apotheosis

    Sir Francis Galton could be considered an early evolutionary
    alchemist. His own cousin's theory of evolution was one of his chief
    inspirations. In Memories of My Life, Galton wrote:

      "The publication in 1859 of the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
      made a marked epoch in my own mental development, as it did in that
      of human thought generally. Its effect was to demolish a multitude
      of dogmatic barriers by a single stroke, and to arouse a spirit of
      rebellion against all ancient authorities whose positive and
      unauthenticated statements were contradicted by modern science."
      (Galton, Memories of My Life, p. 287)

    Viewing evolutionary theory in conjunction with the alchemical mandate
    for man's consciously engineered apotheosis, one inevitably recognizes
    a belief system that exhibits all of the characteristics of a
    religion. This revelation is most clearly illustrated by Galton's
    statements in Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development:

      "The chief result of these Inquiries has been to elicit the
      religious significance of the doctrine of evolution. It suggests an
      alteration in our mental attitude, and imposes a new moral duty.
      The new mental attitude is one of a greater sense of moral freedom,
      responsibility, and opportunity; the new duty which is supposed to
      be exercised concurrently with, and not in opposition to the old
      ones upon which the social fabric depends, is an endeavor to
      further evolution, especially that of the human race." (Galton,
      Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, p. 337, 1883)

    That Galton recognized the "religious significance of evolution" is no
    accident. Throughout the years, this Masonically inspired religion of
    emergent deities has resurfaced under various appellations. Wagar
    enumerates its numerous manifestations:

      "Nineteenth- and early twentieth-century thought teems with
      time-bound emergent deities. Scores of thinkers preached some sort
      of faith in what is potential in time, in place of the traditional
      Christian and mystical faith in a power outside of time. Hegel's
      Weltgeist, Comte's Humanite, Spencer's organismic humanity
      inevitably improving itself by the laws of evolution, Nietzsche's
      doctrine of superhumanity, the conception of a finite God given
      currency by J.S. Mill, Hastings Rashdall, and William James, the
      vitalism of Bergson and Shaw, the emergent evolutionism of Samuel
      Alexander and Lloyd Morgan, the theories of divine immanence in the
      liberal movement in Protestant theology, and du Nouy's telefinalism
      - all are exhibits in evidence of the influence chiefly of
      evolutionary thinking, both before and after Darwin, in Western
      intellectual history. The faith of progress itself - especially the
      idea of progress as built into the evolutionary scheme of things -
      is in every way the psychological equivalent of religion." (Wagar,
      pp. 106 - 7, 1961)

    This emergent deity, Man (spelled with a capitalized M to denote his
    purported divinity), would be fully enthroned through the efforts of
    alchemists themselves. Galton would reintroduce the concept of alchemy
    under the appellation of eugenics, a term derived from Greek for "well
    born." The basic precepts of eugenics were delineated in Galton's
    Hereditary Genius, a racist polemic advocating a system of selective
    breeding for the purposes of providing "more suitable races or strains
    of blood a better chance of prevailing over the less suitable"
    (Galton, Hereditary Genius, p. 24, 1869). According to Galton, society
    should be eugenically regimented. The framework of such a society
    would be a caste system where status was assigned according to genetic
    superiority. In an article in the January 1873 edition of Fraser's
    Magazine, Galton stated:

      "I do not see why any insolence of caste should prevent the gifted
      class, when they had the power, from treating their [lower caste]
      compatriots with all kindness, as long as they maintained celibacy.
      But if these continued to procreate children, inferior in moral,
      intellectual, and physical qualities, it is easy to believe that
      the time may come when such persons would be considered as enemies
      to the State, and to have forfeited all claims to kindness." (qutd.
      in Chase, pp. 100, 1977)

    Galton hoped that such societal regimentation would promote
    "eugenically sound" breeding amongst the citizenry. Summarizing
    Galton's objectives, Allan Chase explains: "What Galton was talking
    about here was the power to breed people as we breed pigs" (Chase, p.
    101, 1977). Of course, as George Orwell opined in Animal Farm, some
    pigs are more equal than others. According to Galton's cousin and
    racialist progenitor, Charles Darwin, the pigs of higher stock were
    the Anglo-Saxons. This becomes evident in Darwinian Josiah Strong's
    manifesto, America's Destiny. Quoting Darwin, Strong wrote:

      "'At the present day,' says Mr. Darwin, 'civilized nations are
      everywhere supplanting barbarous nations, excepting, where the
      climate opposes a deadly barrier; and they succeed mainly, though
      exclusively, through their arts, which are the products of the
      intellect.' He continues: 'Whether the extinction of inferior races
      before the advancing Anglo-Saxon seems to the reader sad or
      otherwise, it certainly appears probable...Is there room for
      reasonable doubt that this race, unless devitalized by alcohol and
      tobacco, is destined to dispossess many weaker races, assimilate
      others, and mold the remainder, until, in a very true and important
      sense, it has Anglo-Saxonized mankind?'." (Strong, pp. 165 - 80,

    Of course, it comes as no real surprise that such thinking underpinned
    the racialist policies of Nazi Germany, which was a scientific
    dictatorship edified by Darwinian evolution. It comes as even less a
    surprise that Leonard Darwin, son of Charles, was vice-president of
    both the 1912 and 1921 International Eugenics Congresses. The first of
    these two meetings was the outgrowth of a 1911 gathering of the
    International Society for Racial Hygiene, a predominantly German
    organization. That Germany would see the full enactment of eugenical
    policies is hardly a coincidence.

Planned Parenthood: The Racist Legacy of Margaret Sanger

    Although the Nazis' eugenical Holocaust of WWII constituted an
    enormous public relations disaster for proponents of eugenics, the
    movement would later resurface under the banner of population control
    and radical environmentalism. Researchers Tarpley and Chaitkin
    document this transmogrification:

      "The population control or zero population growth movement, which
      grew rapidly in the late 1960s thanks to free media exposure and
      foundation grants for a stream of pseudoscientific propaganda about
      the alleged 'population bomb' and the 'limits to growth,' was a
      continuation of the old prewar, protofascist eugenics movement,
      which had been forced to go into temporary eclipse when the world
      recoiled in horror at the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the
      name of eugenics. By mid-1960s, the same old crackpot eugenicists
      had resurrected themselves as the population-control and
      environmentalist movement. Planned Parenthood was a perfect example
      of the transmogrification. Now, instead of demanding the
      sterilization of the inferior races, the newly packaged eugenicists
      talked about the population bomb, giving the poor 'equal access' to
      birth control, and 'freedom of choice'." (Tarpley & Chaitkin, p.
      203, 1992)

    Indeed, Planned Parenthood successfully carried the banner of eugenics
    into the post-WWII era. Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret
    Sanger, a virulently racist woman who touted the slogan: "Birth
    Control: to create a race of thoroughbreds." Her manifesto, entitled
    The Pivot of Civilization, thoroughly delineates the mission of
    Planned Parenthood and its allied organizations in the eugenics
    movement. In this treatise, which featured an introduction written by
    Freemason and Fabian socialist H.G. Wells, Sanger reveals the true
    motives underpinning the promotion of birth control:

      "Birth Control, which has been criticized as negative and
      destructive, is really the greatest and most truly eugenic method,
      and its adoption as part of the program of Eugenics would
      immediately give a concrete and realistic power to that science...
      as the most constructive and necessary of the means to racial
      health." (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 189, 1922)

    Sanger believed that society's tolerance of "morons," "human weeds,"
    and the "feeble-minded' was encouraging dysgenics. To remedy this
    purported genetic threat, Sanger unabashedly promoted the
    implementation of authoritarian measures:

      "The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be
      faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the
      hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be
      segregated during the reproductive period.... we prefer the policy
      of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is
      absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded." (Sanger, The Pivot of
      Civilization, pp. 101 - 102, 1922)

    Understand, these are the words of a so-called "proponent of
    reproductive rights." Moreover, Sanger desired to see the
    establishment of a gulag system within America for the internment of
    the "feeble-minded." In an issue of Birth Control Review, she wrote:

      "To apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation
      to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted... to
      apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons
      where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for
      the period of their entire lives.... " (Sanger, "Plan of Peace,"
      Birth Control Review, pp. 107-8, 1932)

    Although Sanger's gulag system was not formally enacted in the United
    States, her vision saw horrible fulfillment in Nazi Germany. It comes
    as little surprise that Planned Parenthood's board of directors
    included Nazi supporters such as Dr. Lothrop Stoddard, author of a
    racist tract entitled The Rising Tide of Color Against White
    Supremacy. In fact, Birth Control Review acted as a conduit for the
    dissemination of Nazi propaganda in America. In April of 1933, Dr.
    Ernst Rudin, Hitler's director of genetic sterilization and a founder
    of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene, published an article in Birth
    Control Review. Entitled "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need," the
    article presented the following appeal:

      "The danger to the community of the unsegregated feeble-minded
      woman is more evident. Most dangerous are the middle and high
      grades living at large who, despite the fact that their defect is
      not easily recognizable, should nevertheless be prevented from
      procreation.... In my view we should act without delay." (Rudin,
      "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need," Birth Control Review, pp.
      102-4, 1933)

    Of course, in Rudin's native country, the "feeble-minded" did not
    remain "unsegregrated" for very long. The same year that Sanger's
    publication printed Rudin's article, Ernst collaborated with Heinrich
    Himmler on Germany's 1933 sterilization law. This genocidal edict
    stipulated the sterilization of all Jews and "colored" German
    children. Eventually, the "undesirables" were collected, segregated,
    and systematically murdered. The final result of the Nazi eugenics
    program was the Holocaust, which claimed six million lives.

    Yet, how many people would have been segregated for orderly disposal
    according to Sanger's vision? Upon examination of army statistics,
    Sanger concluded that:

      "...nearly half - 47.3 per cent - of the population had the
      mentality of twelve-year-old children or less - in other words that
      they are morons." (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 263, 1922)

    Sanger expressed dismal hopes for a vast segment of the population,
    declaring that: "only 13,500,000 will ever show superior intelligence"
    (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 264, 1922). Thus, only a meager
    13.5% of the population would be permitted to procreate. The rest
    would be segregated for orderly disposal. Evidently, Sanger's
    holocaust would have even dwarfed Hitler's Final Solution.

    In typical Darwinian fashion, Sanger showed little mercy towards the
    weak. In fact, Margaret expressed a distinct aversion towards the
    poor. Chapter Five of her book is entitled "The Cruelty of Charity."
    Reiterating Malthus' proposal to "disclaim the right of the poor to
    support," she wrote:

      "Organized charity itself is....the surest sign that our
      civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuating constantly
      increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents."
      (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 108, 1922)

    Sanger particularly loathed:

      "...a special type of philanthropy or benevolence,....which strikes
      me as being more insidiously injurious than any other.... to supply
      gratis medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers." (Sanger,
      The Pivot of Civilization, p. 114, 1922)

    According to Margaret, such an investment of time, effort, resources,
    and love represented the height of futility:

      ".... we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an
      ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who
      never should have been born at all....." (Sanger, The Pivot of
      Civilization, p. 187, 1922)

    Planned Parenthood retains an active role in the scientific
    dictatorship's project of eugenical regimentation today. Despite
    revelations of Nazi atrocities constituted a public relations disaster
    for the organization, Planned Parenthood survived and continues to
    tangibly enact Sanger's vision. In fact, so-called "conservative,
    pro-life, pro-family, Christian" President George Bush Sr. pledged his
    whole-hearted support to the group. Researchers Tarpley and Chaitkin

      "Although Planned Parenthood was forced, during the fascist era and
      immediately thereafter, to tone down Sanger's racist rhetoric from
      'race betterment' to 'family planning' for the benefit of the poor
      and racial minorities, the organization's basic goal of curbing the
      population growth rate among 'undesirables' never really changed.
      Bush publicly asserted that he agreed '1,000 percent' with Planned
      Parenthood." (Tarpley & Chaitkin, p. 195, 1992)

Transhumanism: Techno-Eugenics and the End of Humanity

    Today, Galton's agenda of biological totalitarianism has resurfaced as
    the World Transhumanist Association. However, equipped with
    nanotechnology and genetic engineering, this movement presents a
    technologically augmented form of eugenics. Richard Hayes, executive
    director of the Center for Genetics and Society, elaborates:

      "Last June at Yale University, the World Transhumanist Association
      held its first national conference. The Transhumanists have
      chapters in more than 20 countries and advocate the breeding of
      'genetically enriched' forms of 'post-human' beings. Other
      advocates of the new techno-eugenics, such as Princeton University
      professor Lee Silver, predict that by the end of this century, 'All
      aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and
      the knowledge industry [will be] controlled by members of the
      GenRich class... Naturals [will] work as low-paid service providers
      or as laborers...'" (Hayes, 2004)

    Here is the vision of the Transhumanist movement... Huxley's Brave New
    World where the new class distinction is genetic. Yet, just how long
    shall the GenRich class tolerate the existence of its biological
    subordinates? Hayes continues:

      "What happens then? Here's Dr. Richard Lynn, emeritus professor at
      the University of Ulster, who, like Silver, supports human genetic
      modification: 'What is called for here is not genocide, the killing
      off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to
      think realistically in terms of the 'phasing out' of such
      peoples....Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less
      competent'." (Hayes, 2004)

    This is a frightening proposition indeed. C. Christopher Hook
    delineates the philosophy underpinning Transhumanism:

      That we are biological creatures is simply our current status,
      transhumanists believe, but it is not necessary for defining who we
      are or who we should be. Bart Kosko, a professor of electrical
      engineering at the University of Southern California, puts it more
      bluntly in his book Heaven in a Chip (2002): "Biology is not
      destiny. It was never more than tendency. It was just nature's
      first quick and dirty way to compute with meat. Chips are destiny."

      British roboticist Kevin Warwick put it this way: "I was born
      human. But this was an accident of fate-a condition merely of time
      and place." This sounds startingly reminiscent of what nihilist
      Frederick Nietzsche wrote in Thus Spake Zarathustra: "I teach you
      the overman. Man is something to be overcome" (Hook, 2004).

    Like Nietzsche's overman, the roboman of Warwick and Kosko represents
    yet another incarnation of Adam Weishaupt's "inner Areopagites: man
    made perfect as a god-without-God" (Billington, p. 97, 1980).

    A central feature of Darwinism has been the belief in great
    extinctions. That belief remains firmly embedded within the crusade of
    the Transhumanist movement. Hook elaborates:

      "Katherine Hayles, a professor of English at the University of
      California, Los Angeles, says in How We Became Posthuman (1999)
      that 'in the posthuman, there are no essential differences, or
      absolute demarcations, between bodily existence and computer
      simulation, cybernetic mechanism and biological organism, robot
      technology and human goals.' She concludes her book with a warning:
      'Humans can either go gently into that good night, joining the
      dinosaurs as a species that once ruled the earth but is now
      obsolete, or hang on for a while longer by becoming machines
      themselves. In either case ... the age of the human is drawing to a
      close'." (Hook, 2004)

    According to the Darwinian doctrine of the Transhumanist movement,
    mankind is the next species slated for extinction. How does the
    GenRich class intend to regulate the rest of the "dysgenics" until
    their ultimate extinction? Transhumanist ideologue and Deputy Director
    of the National Science Foundation's Division of Information and
    Intelligent Systems William Sims Bainbridge provides the answer:

      "Techniques such as genetic engineering, psychoactive drugs and
      electronic control of the brain make possible a transformation of
      the species into docile, fully-obedient, 'safe' organisms."
      (Bainbridge, 1982)

    In other words, the pharmacological totalitarianism of Aldous Huxley's
    Brave New World. Chemically numbed and anesthetized, the "dysgenics"
    will resign themselves to extinction in the posthuman era. Meanwhile,
    the eugenical alchemists of the elite continue to write the final
    chapter of the evolutionary script and they have left no room for
    humanity in the last pages.

Sources Cited

      * Bainbridge, William Sims, "[11] Religions for a Galactic
        Civilization," excerpted from Science Fiction and Space Futures,
        edited by Eugene M. Emme. San Diego: American Astronautical
        Society, pages 187-201, 1982.
      * Billington, James H, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the
        Revolutionary Faith, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1980.
      * Chase, Allan, The Legacy of Malthus, Knopf: distributed by Random
        House, 1977.
      * Darlington, "The Origin of Darwinism," Scientific American, May
      * Galton, Francis, Hereditary Genius, Macmillan, London, 1869.
      * Galton, Francis, Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development,
        New York, MacMillan and Co., 1883.
      * Hayes, Richard, "[12]Selective Science," February 12, 2004.
      * Hook, C. Christopher, "[13]The Techno Sapiens Are Coming," January
      * Huxley, Thomas, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays, New York:
        Appleton, 1896.
      * Rudin, Ernst, "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need," Birth
        Control Review, Volume XVII, Number 4, April 1933.
      * Sagan, Carl, Cosmos, Random House, New York, 1980.
      * Sanger, Margaret, The Pivot of Civilization, Brentano's Press, NY,
      * Sanger, Margaret, "Plan for Peace," Birth Control Review, Volume
        XVI, Number 4, April 1932.
      * Strong, Josiah, Our Country, New York, 1885.
      * Tarpley, Webster & Anton Chaitkin, [14]George Bush: The
        Unauthorized Biography, Executive Intelligence Review, Washington
        D.C., 1992.
      * Wagar, W. Warren, H.G. Wells and the World State, Yale University
        Press, New Haven, 1961.
      * Wilmshurst, W.L., The Meaning of Masonry, Gramercy Books, New York

    About the Author

    Phillip D. Collins acted as the editor for The Hidden Face of
    Terrorism. He has an Associate of Arts and Science. Currently, he is
    studying for a bachelor's degree in Communications at Wright State
    University. During the course of his seven-year college career,
    Phillip has studied philosophy, religion, and classic literature. He
    co-authored the book, The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship:
    An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st
    Century, is [15]available online here.
    CSS printer friendly enabled
    mail to a friend [16]Send this to a friend

    "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in
    the major media."
    William Colby (Former CIA Director)

    "Language is a field of battle, the media is the artillery, and
    vocabulary is the ammunition. The NWO has taken the field by storm,
    and is proceeding with coordinated attacks on several fronts, using
    all the latest high-tech vocabulary ammunition. They've laid a bed of
    land mines that cripple us when we try to stand on them: 'liberalism',
    conservatism', prosperity', 'democracy'."
    Richard Moore, Doublespeak

    "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
    liberties than standing armies."
    Thomas Jefferson

    "I have the greatest admiration for your propaganda. Propaganda in the
    West is carried out by experts who have had the best training in the
    world -- in the field of advertizing -- and have mastered the
    techniques with exceptional proficiency ... Yours are subtle and
    persuasive; ours are crude and obvious ... I think that the
    fundamental difference between our worlds, with respect to propaganda,
    is quite simple. You tend to believe yours ... and we tend to
    disbelieve ours."
    Soviet correspondent based five years in the U.S.

    "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
    that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
    and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by
    human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and
    behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity
    Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder and secretary,
    respectively, of the Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution,

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge
    to rule."
    Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956), American editor, critic

    "This Act (the Federal Reserve Act, Dec. 23rd 1913) establishes the
    most gigantic trust on earth. When the President (Woodrow Wilson)
    signs the Bill, the invisible government of the Monetary Power will be
    legalised... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by
    this banking and currency Bill."
    Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr.

    "All propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt its spiritual level
    to the perception of the least intelligent of those towards whom it
    intends to direct itself."
    Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf ("My Struggle"), Vol. I

    "Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must
    destroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition."
    Peter Singer (father of the animal rights movement), The Deweese
    Report, November 1998

    "The owners and managers of the press determine which person, which
    facts, which version of the facts, and which ideas shall reach the
    Commission On Freedom Of The Press


   11. http://web.archive.org/web/20030219105541/http://users.erols.com/bainbri/dl/relgal.htm
   12. http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/9937/view/print
   13. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/001/1.36.html
   14. http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
   15. http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-31164-4
   16. http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/sendToFriend.php
   17. http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Evolution.htm#header
   18. http://www.xdevdesign.com/

More information about the paleopsych mailing list