[Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
G. Reinhart-Waller
waluk at earthlink.net
Wed Feb 23 19:35:33 UTC 2005
Hi Alice,
Many teens need a formal spirituality especially if they are without a purposeful meaning to their life. Others find this purpose through their work, or study, or family.
No, I'm not familiar with Frank's post.
Gerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Alice Andrews
To: G. Reinhart-Waller ; The new improved paleopsych list
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
Hi Gerry,
Thanks for the note...
There was an interesting article somewhere--maybe Frank sent it in?--about teenagers and the possiblity that what they were missing was 'religion' or 'spirituality' or a 'sense of purpose and meaning beyond them.' Do you remember reading that on paleo some time ago? I can't find it...But it seems apropos to your missive. (If anyone knows it and can send out again, I'd appreciate!)
Thanks and cheers,
Alice
Hi Alice,
Thanks for the rec re: Nesse's "Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment". Although I still haven't read it I'm familiar with its contents. The issue of 'commitment' especially for young people is something that definitely needs addressing and maybe requiring our youth to make a firm political commitment to a particular party will carry over to their demonstrating less risky behavior with drugs, sex, employment, family or whatever. Yet isn't our youth already politically brainwashed into political awareness or have they flicked away that duty as well? I no longer hang out with our country's young but when I did I found that very few had their head screwed on correctly and many were adrift; from what I hear now they still continue on their aimless flow. When I wrote my original answer my thoughts were on "my generation", not the others. Thanks for your post.
I'll add the book to my list.
Gerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Alice Andrews
To: The new improved paleopsych list
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
Hi Gerry,
Randy Nesse edited a book called "Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment"; do you know it? It's wonderful... if you don't. (His 'Commitment in the Clinic' chapter is superb, btw.) Anyway, I think the book addresses your question. The word 'commitment' itself addresses the question. We have evolved mechanisms for detecting commitment and for detecting possible defection in others. People who tow the party line, etc. are considered committed. We seek out such people because it is proximately and ultimately adaptive to do so. Befriending, supporting, trusting, etc. the uncommitted would have been-- and still is, a risk (or threat). Such risks could have been very costly over our evolutionary history and can be still today. Of course, sometimes such risks (siding with someone who seems to be sitting on the fence, uncommitted, a rebel) can be to one's advantage. But 'ancient-brain' doesn't know this--and probably 'statistics-brain' doesn't know this either!
Anyway, enough late-night babbling! It's a good book and might answer your question...
All best!
Alice
----- Original Message -----
From: G. Reinhart-Waller
To: The new improved paleopsych list
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Paleopsych] Re: paleopsych Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20
>> Someone beyond the liberal/conservative
dichotomy may be rejected by both sides as a nuisance,
a threat to shared assumptions that define a group
against another.
This is absolutely amazing! Why would any audience
reject someone who cannot plop into either the liberal
or conservative camp? Please explain the threat you
feel is apparent. This I need to hear!
Gerry
_______________________________________________
paleopsych mailing list
paleopsych at paleopsych.org
http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
paleopsych mailing list
paleopsych at paleopsych.org
http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/paleopsych/attachments/20050223/993fe022/attachment.html>
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list