[Paleopsych] The Register (UK): Was Einstein a plagiarist?

Premise Checker checker at panix.com
Wed Jan 12 15:27:04 UTC 2005


Was Einstein a plagiarist?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/15/einstein_relativity/print.html

     By [11]Lucy Sherriff
     Published Monday 15th November 2004 15:57 GMT

     A theoretical physicist at the University of Nevada has published a
     paper alleging that Einstein did not derive the gravitational field
     equations at the heart of the General Theory of Relativity, and might
     in fact have copied key equations from fellow physicist David Hilbert.

     The two scientists were working in the same area in 1915, and were
     developing their theories independently but concurrently. Each
     submitted papers for publication throughout November of that year. The
     two were also corresponding about their research, making it hard to
     unravel exactly who knew what, and when. As a consequence the question
     of which researcher can claim priority has been the subject of some
     debate.

     Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg says that contrary to the conclusions in a
     paper published in Science in 1997, Einstein did have the opportunity
     to plagiarise Hilbert's work. He claims that printer's proofs of
     Hilbert's paper have been tampered with, and that a key part of the
     derivation had been excised.

     In their 1997 paper, Corry, Renn and Stachel concluded that Hilbert
     altered his published paper to include the correct forms of the
     gravitation field equations after seeing Einstein's final paper. But
     Winterberg argues that this is impossible. Winterberg suggests that
     someone deliberately tampered with the document, specifically to
     support claims for Einstein's priority. He compares the 'mutilated'
     document with published papers, and notes that certain forms of
     Hilbert's notation were only used by Einstein at a later date.

     "My analysis of Hilbert's mutilated proofs therefore cannot prove that
     Einstein copied from Hilbert," he says. "It proves less, which is that
     it cannot be proved that Einstein could not have copied from Hilbert.
     But it proves that Hilbert had not copied from Einstein, as it has
     been insinuated following the paper by Corry, Renn and Stachel."

     Winterberg concludes that three people should be given credit for
     developing the general theory of relativity: Einstein, for recognising
     the shape of the problem, Grossmann for his insight that the
     contracted Riemann tensor was key to solving the problem, and Hilbert
     for completing the gravitational field theory equations.

     The full explanation can be found
     http://www.physics.unr.edu/faculty/winterberg/Hilbert-Einstein.pdf

     Brits bet on gravity wave discovery
     (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/01/gravity_waves/)
     ESA on mission to surf gravity's waves
     (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/24/gravity_waves/)
     Chocks away for NASA's Einstein test
     (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/21/gravity_iii/)

References

    11. http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2004/11/15/einstein_relativity/



More information about the paleopsych mailing list