[Paleopsych] Sigma Xi: A letter on Patricia Churchland's use of the term "libertarian" in a review of The Ethical Brain , and a reply from Churchland
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sat Sep 10 02:06:51 UTC 2005
A letter on Patricia Churchland's use of
the term "libertarian" in a review of The Ethical Brain ,
and a reply from Churchland
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookshelfLetterTypeDetail/assetid/46005;jsessionid=aaadH7i1yL4II9
Letter to the Bookshelf
A letter on Patricia Churchland's use of the term "libertarian" in a
review of The Ethical Brain, and a reply from Churchland
July 26, 2005
To the editor:
In reading through the book review "Brain-Based Values," by Patricia
Churchland (July-August 2005), I was astonished to see that she has
named a subset of philosophers, who believe that voluntary decisions
are created only by the will, "libertarians." She then likened these
so-called libertarians to naive flat-earthers and creationists. I have
no idea to whom she is referring, but as a lifelong libertarian and a
30-year member of the Libertarian Party, I would like to set the
record straight.
Libertarianism is a social, political and economic philosophy grounded
in the liberal political ideas that emerged in the 18th and 19th
centuries and upon which the founders of our nation based much of the
design of our system of government. In essence, we believe that the
use of government force should be strictly limited to its legitimate
role in the justice system and national defense and that individuals
should be given maximum choice in their actions as well as
responsibility for those actions. In the economic sphere, our beliefs
are best expressed in the works of Friedrich August von Hayek, Ludwig
von Mises and Milton Friedman. And, while he denies the label
libertarian, Robert Nozick in his Anarchy, State, and Utopia expresses
the libertarian philosophy quite thoroughly. This is not exactly a
naive group. I highly recommend them to your readers, and particularly
to Ms. Churchland. It has been my experience that, in general,
libertarians are more sophisticated than average, both politically and
scientifically. Whoever this group of philosophers are, they most
assuredly are not libertarians.
Malcolm Johnson
Lapeer, Michigan
Patricia Churchland replies:
Thank you for your note. I do apologize for the confusion. In the
context of free will discussions, philosophers use the term
libertarian as I specified. I do think this is a most unfortunate use,
however, and for exactly the reasons you point out. By using it that
way, philosophers have created an ambiguity, to no good purpose. I
should have inserted a comment to clarify that the philosopher's sense
of libertarian as used in free will discussions has NO relation to
that term as used in a political context. As it happens, I share many
of the views of libertarians (political, not free will) and have been
a great admirer of John Stuart Mill for as many years as I have been
studying philosophy.
Best wishes,
Patricia Smith Churchland, Chair
UC President's Professor of Philosophy
University of California San Diego
La Jolla CA 92093
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list