[Paleopsych] Book World: Class Struggles
Premise Checker
checker at panix.com
Sat Sep 17 01:27:38 UTC 2005
Class Struggles
Book World, 5.9.4
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/01/AR2005090101762_pf.html
Stories from the front lines of American schools reveal the world
beneath policy debates.
By Eric Hoover
In 1983, a national panel of education experts released the report
that launched a thousand headaches. The document, "A Nation at Risk:
The Imperative for Educational Reform," warned that public schools
were foundering. The nation's jaw dropped, and politicians promised
improvements.
Two decades later, they're still promising. But the bickering over
reforms is ceaseless. Take the No Child Left Behind Act, the
controversial federal law requiring schools to show annual progress on
state tests taken by students in grades 3 through 8. Supporters say
the get-tough program promotes high standards and accountability;
critics say the plan is too rigid and out of step with reality. Who's
right? And how do such big questions relate to struggles in school
systems near you?
Satisfying answers rarely come from politicians and wonks, who dwell
in a fog of slogans and statistics. But welcome are those authors who
find the pulse of human drama in the education trenches. The
experiences of students, parents, teachers and administrators in
American schools make compelling stories, full of heroes, villains and
conflicts.
A School House Divided
A girl named Pineapple poses the question that haunts Jonathan Kozol's
The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in
America (Crown, $25). "What's it like," the black sixth grader asks
the white author, "over there where you live?" Like other students in
this sweeping report, Pineapple attends a public school where
minorities make up nearly 100 percent of the enrollment. Her curiosity
about whites, who attend schools in an unknowable "over there," speaks
to the racial divide that Brown v. Board of Education attempted to
bridge a half-century ago. Kozol, a best-selling education writer,
argues convincingly that de facto segregation endures in urban school
systems from Seattle to the South Bronx. His firsthand reporting
reveals districts in which schools are separate and unequal. He relays
insights from poor students who learn in buildings where ceilings
leak, rats scurry, and toilets don't flush. In these ramshackle
places, which often lack enough books, desks and qualified teachers,
the drumbeat of school-accountability measures sounds hollow.
In an effective series of anecdotes, Kozol asserts that
standards-based reforms turn poor schools -- with the fewest resources
to teach the skills those tests measure -- into mindless educational
factories. He warns that high-stakes tests threaten to turn low-income
students into "examination soldiers" who do not so much acquire
knowledge as regurgitate facts. He provides statistics that suggest
the much-touted reforms have failed to close the so-called achievement
gap between white and minority students. And he cites data showing the
gaps between per-pupil spending in predominantly white urban school
districts and districts that serve mostly minority students. In a
chapter called "Deadly Lies," the author predicts that until students
from different economic backgrounds attend schools of equal quality
and resources, No Child Left Behind will not shrink but expand "the
vast divide between two separate worlds of future cognitive activity,
political sagacity, social health and economic status, and the
capability of children of minorities to thrive." A call for activism,
The Shame of the Nation firmly grounds school-reform issues in the
thorny context of race and concludes that the nation has failed to
deliver the promise of Brown.
Power to the Parents
Bribes, lies and scandals are part of education's ugly underbelly, Joe
Williams reveals in Cheating Our Kids: How Politics and Greed Ruin
Education (St. Martin's, $24.95, forthcoming in October). Williams, a
veteran education reporter, makes full use of his journalistic skills
in this blistering analysis of public-school politics. (Friends of
teachers unions, take cover.) Vivid anecdotes about administrators
skimming from school budgets and teachers-of-the-year getting fired
because of their expensive seniority support his case that the goals
of education bureaucrats often conflict with the interests of
students.
"As a society," Williams writes, "we are dismissing the needs of
individual students to protect a romantic notion of public education
whose very core is consumed with meeting the needs of adults first and
foremost." Occasionally, these valid structural critiques of "the
system" lapse into broad-brush criticisms of the "education cartel."
But his frustrations, grounded in accounts of bureaucracy run amok,
echo those of many parents.
Even so, Cheating Our Kids hits an inspirational note with its
instructive explanation of how parents, business leaders and activists
from both ends of the political spectrum helped bring school choice to
Milwaukee in the 1990s, allowing low-income families to send their
children to private schools at the public's expense. The tale proves
that dedicated citizens who demand a better education for their
children can move the mountains known as politicians.
Unconventional Wisdom
Everybody knows that reducing class sizes in public schools improves
the quality of education. But where did they get that idea? Not from
Jay P. Greene's Education Myths: What Special Interest Groups Want You
to Believe about Our Schools -- And Why It Isn't So (Rowman &
Littlefield, $24.95). Greene, a senior fellow at the Manhattan
Institute, a conservative think tank, challenges 18 popular
assumptions in this accessible, data-driven polemic.
The attacks come fast and furious against popular beliefs about class
sizes, graduation rates and underperforming schools. Greene argues
that public schools receive adequate funding, countering Kozol's
"anecdotal reasoning" that there are spending gaps between urban and
suburban schools. He also argues persuasively that voucher programs do
not harm public schools, as some critics of school-choice contend. His
arguments stick close to the numbers compiled from numerous education
studies, and, generally, Greene makes strong cases that would keep
even education-policy gurus on their toes.
Still, all the numbers in the world won't end the debate over what's
true. Just ask your favorite teacher what he or she thinks about the
elaborate statistical analyses behind the following statement from
Education Myths : "It is simply not the case that teachers are less
richly rewarded for their work than those in similar professions."
Daydream Believer
In Crash Course: Imagining a Better Future for Public Education
(Riverhead, $24.95), Chris Whittle, the maverick businessman who
became an education insider, describes his vision for American schools
in painstaking detail. Whittle is the former owner of Esquire magazine
and the founder of Edison Schools, a company that manages 157 public
schools in 19 states and educates 70,000 students. Naturally, the
author promotes splicing the private-sector's DNA (think free-market
competition) into the traditional education system.
Whittle's blueprint calls for radical new curricula, massive
educational research-and-development efforts, and better training and
pay for teachers and principals. He imagines students studying
independently, freed from the constraints of regimented class
schedules. "We are still operating in a type of Charles Dickens
mindset," Whittle writes, "believing that these young, half-civilized
things called children must be literally whipped into shape, if not by
a stick then by a never-ending schedule."
The detailed business strategies in Crash Course may cause drowsiness
in some casual readers, and the 37-page leap into the year 2030 may
puzzle others. But the scale of Whittle's imagination and his
disarming optimism make this a refreshing companion to gloomier
education tomes.
Pragmatism 101
My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student
(Cornell Univ., $24) is the true tale of an anthropology professor who
became a fly on the dorm-room wall. Rebekah Nathan (a pseudonym for
Cathy Small of Northern Arizona University, recently unmasked by the
New York Sun) enrolled as an undergraduate student at the university
where she teaches, moved in with her subjects and took classes for two
semesters. Her goal was to understand the mysteries of modern
students, including why they snooze in classes and skip assigned
readings.
A few distracting scholarly digressions aside, Nathan engagingly
observes that many students care little about intellectual matters and
see their university as a career greenhouse. No revelations there. But
that campus life is no "Animal House" may come as a surprise. Juggling
classes, assignments and jobs demands survival skills, the professor
discovers. The key to sanity: "controlling college by shaping
schedules, taming professors, and limiting workload."
My Freshman Year provides some keen insights into the causes of
students' fierce pragmatism. For one thing, debt often drives their
career aspirations and, in turn, their choice of majors and
extracurricular pursuits. Colleges, Nathan argues, must adapt to those
21st-century realities: "Educational policy . . . cannot afford to
rely on inaccurate or idealized versions of what students are." But
understanding students is not the same as sympathizing with them.
Nathan's vow to lighten students' loads by assigning them less reading
sounds like blasphemy to this bookworm. My Freshman Year provides a
long list of what ails college students, but a short list of remedies.
·
Eric Hoover is a senior editor at the Chronicle of Higher Education.
More information about the paleopsych
mailing list