<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Me too.<br>
<br>
Do we use the United Nations? That hasn't worked in the past....is
there a new resurrection?<br>
<br>
Gerry<br>
<br>
Christian Rauh wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid42364EE2.3050301@uconn.edu" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">No world cop.
Christian
G. Reinhart-Waller wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This is of interest. If US is not world cop, then who would you like it
to be? The Russians, Chinese, one of the South American
dictatorships....moving forward takes a country willing to gamble at
playing the role of policeman in maintaining peace. That is US.....not
because it is better at it but because no one else wants the role.
The only allies we have in Iraq are the Iraqi people who are interested
in Democracy. That's good enough for me.
Gerry
Steve Hovland wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">When the US can no longer afford the pretense
of being the world cop, we may move more toward
group security.
As far as help in Iraq, we have fewer and fewer
allies. Most of the world is horrified by what we
are doing, no matter how we try to pretty it up
with blather about democracy.
Steve Hovland
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.stevehovland.net">www.stevehovland.net</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
paleopsych mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:paleopsych@paleopsych.org">paleopsych@paleopsych.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych">http://lists.paleopsych.org/mailman/listinfo/paleopsych</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>