<html>
<body>
Are there any notes or references available on-line relating the
decision-making of quantum particles to the decision-making of bees (or
other mind-body entities)? My own interest is in the commonality that
links the decision-making across different organisms/entities, and I wrap
it up in the notion of bodies-as-tools. If you were a quantum particle,
your particle-body predisposes you to making and habituating different
types of choices to what you would otherwise make/habituate if had the
mind-body of a bee, or, of course, a human - more interestingly, in my
most recent work that I've submitted to a journal, the mind-body of a man
or the mind-body of a woman.<br><br>
BTW - I agree with Pavel's concept of involving the whole cosmos, to
incorporate quantum principles relating to non-locality. Are we on the
same page? Outrageously improbable forms (eg., where intelligent design
theory is invoked to explain the unexplainable) can be more realistically
accounted for when your option-space is infinite.<br><br>
Stephen<br><br>
At 11:39 AM 4/3/05, HowlBloom@aol.com wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>
<br>
By the way, Pavel Kurakin suggests that a similar hierarchical summation
of the entire cosmos gets fed into the "decision" of a single
quantum particle when it "picks" which receptor device it
should move to. Or at least Pavel suggests this in the
interpretation of his work I've been trying to smuggle into a paper he
and I are working on that compares the decision-making of quantum
particles to the decision-making of bees.</blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
_______________________________________________________<br><br>
There can be no complexity without simplicity:<br>
<a href="http://members.iinet.net.au/~tramont/biosem.html" eudora="autourl">
http://members.iinet.net.au/~tramont/biosem.html<br>
</a>_______________________________________________________</font></body>
</html>