[extropy-chat] Re: Why Kerry is -still- a better choice than Bush,
brentn at freeshell.org
Sun Aug 15 04:58:03 UTC 2004
(8/14/04 23:37) Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
>They're mostly not `against him' in the relevant sense (for this thread) of
>asserting witness of his alleged cowardice and incompetence in the face of
>the enemy. They are against his subsequent claims that the Vietnam war
>involved unjustified terror and atrocities, claims in which they feel
>painfully implicated. That dirty rat! Everyone knows that the Vietnam war
>was conducted in a polite and gentlemanly way by the Americans and their
>allies, much as the Iraq war is being conducted nowadays.
Exactly. This is why Mike's claims of a vast swell of swift boat veterans decrying Kerry falls flat. To paraphrase someone else: "John Kerry is a douchebag but he's still a better leader than the Shrub." Just because a veteran disagrees with Kerry's anti-war stance does not mean that he agrees with O'Neill's wingnuttery. To assume otherwise is so incredibly, blindly partisan as to defy common sense.
Geek of all Trades
"Specialization is for insects" -- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the extropy-chat