[extropy-chat] urban sprawl as defense
Stephen J. Van Sickle
sjvans at ameritech.net
Tue Aug 24 15:32:29 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 01:53, Samantha Atkins wrote:
> I have mentioned a few already. Beyond that I don't think an honest
> look can fail to supply you with as many examples as you have the
> stomach for.
That's a cop out. You made the claim, now refuse to back it up. Just a
few words would do.
I can't find *any* examples of "irrational and oppressive" acts that the
"west is throwing its weight behind". Does that mean I am being
dishonest, as you imply?
I wouldn't be terribly surprised if there were some, which is why I
wanted examples. I can find "oppressive" actions, but that is the
nature of both government and war. Shooting someone is a pretty
oppressive act. I don't think we are doing away with either government
or war in the near future.
But I really can't find anything at all, rational, irrational,
oppressive, liberating, indifferent, *anything* that the "west throws
its weight behind". Furthermore, I can't find anything (yet) that I
would consider "irrational" (even the almost inexplicable actions of
Saddam Hussein have their own reasoning, if you dig deep enough). Just
because you don't agree with a reason does not automatically make it
I find this all very distressing, since I think a strong opposition is
essential to civil society. Yet much of what I see from the opposition
these days amount to personal attacks ("irrational", "honest", "Bush is
dumb") and a refusal to debate the facts and issues. It is ultimately
self-defeating. It is not like there aren't a great many sound
arguments against the course of action being taken.
More information about the extropy-chat