[extropy-chat] gambolling laws

Damien Broderick thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Dec 23 04:44:40 UTC 2004


At 08:36 PM 12/22/2004 -0800, Spike wrote:
>Brett Paatsch:
>
>...My impression is that the gambolling laws were not really laid down
>to *intentionally* prevent the free development of this sort of thing...
>
>
>What?  There are laws against gay or light-hearted
>recreational activity for diversion or amusement?

Yes, but mostly they only pertain to lambs.

(Well, and some benighted precincts do still object to `gay recreational 
activity'.)

Damien Broderick 





More information about the extropy-chat mailing list