[extropy-chat] Re: Re: (Ethics/Epistemology) Arrow of Morality [Was:The statement that
dirk at neopax.com
Fri Apr 15 12:07:35 UTC 2005
The Avantguardian wrote:
>--- Dirk Bruere <dirk at neopax.com> wrote:
>>Or, if Zen Budhhism, that there is no 'self' at any
> Dirk, you are shit on a stick. Go sit under a
>bodhi tree until you burst into flame. Let me know if
>I can be any help. Took me a motorcycle accident where
>I almost died and three months in a wheel chair before
I've done enough acid to have seen several POV.
I rather favour Minsky's Society of Mind when it comes to explaining
that kind of stuff.
However, one conclusion I have come to is that there is probably a
minimal neural structure that defines 'consciousness' or 'self
awareness', and that it is common to all people. It doesn't need memory,
or sensory input and doesn't seem to do a lot but it is all that we
experience in a non-machine -like manner.
>>That's a complex issue and one which has still not
>>been resolved to the
>>satisfaction of the majority of physicists.
>>Ditto the question of whether math is invented or
>>discovered, or a
>>combination of the two.
>When the universe plays hide and seek with itself, it
>plays to win.
Or do we prop it up?
Or perhaps like Greg Egan's Quarantine we reduce it from what it could be to what it is.
The political party for the new millenium
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.11 - Release Date: 14/04/2005
More information about the extropy-chat