[extropy-chat] Analyzing the simulation argument

[Dirk Bruere]

Rick wrote:

>-----Original Message-----
>Dan Clemmensen wrote:
>
>  
>
>>all points on  the simulation continuum are indistinguishable from the
>>    
>>
>no-sim hypothesis.
>
>I concede no victory here. 
>
>Dan's assertion *could* certainly be true. And, in most cases, if you see
>anything truly strange happen that would lend itself to supporting the sim
>hypothesis you could just as easily choose instead to doubt your own sanity
>or some such. But I still allow for the possibility of an analysis of my
>  
>
Especially as it would almost certainly be non-reproducible.

-- 
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005