[extropy-chat] what can you show us?

c c beb_cc at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 12 01:46:49 UTC 2005


Being there is no clear international law isn't proof
of undeniably malicious intent needed in the case of
war crimes?  Since technically Iraq was in violation
of agreements made previously with the UN, it would
have to be shown America invaded to entirely subjugate
Iraq and commit war crimes. If you look backwards to
2003 so you can say, "now that we know America
couldn't win the peace, then overthrowing the Baathist
regime was futile, and the administration had to know
a sustained resistance to occupation was inevitable &
unbeatable", that is to say you are attempting to
prove the course of the war was inevitable and America
knew so in advance. If you can demonstrate this you
have a solid case.


--- Robert Lindauer <robgobblin at aol.com> wrote:
> What evidence of wrongness are you looking for other
> than piles of dead 
> bodies?  Why aren't they sufficient?



		
____________________________________________________
Sell on Yahoo! Auctions – no fees. Bid on great items.  
http://auctions.yahoo.com/



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list