[extropy-chat] Solar math (was: Nuke 'em)
wingcat at pacbell.net
Tue Oct 25 16:35:38 UTC 2005
--- Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:11:56PM -0700, Adrian Tymes wrote:
> > Math errors detected.
> Very possible. I hacked that out in a few minutes at breakfast
> before dashing off to work.
No prob. I recall a certain antpower post of mine... ^_^;;
> > would lead to a much lower yield. But let's overlook that for now.
> Actually 6 kWh is reasonably conservative for
The point was German insolation vs. US (average) insolation. Germany
gets less, being closer to the pole, da?
> but this is
> of magnitude, anyway.
True - even with the German/US difference (about 6 kWh/m^2 in US vs.
about 1 kWh/m^s in Germany).
> Only if you want to completely cover the energy input, industry
If you're going to cover a nation's power needs, you definitely need to
> the more power to you.
Pun intended? ;)
More information about the extropy-chat