[extropy-chat] Cryonics and uploading

Heartland velvethum at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 30 23:15:47 UTC 2006


>> If the original got killed in front of the perfect copy, the original
>> would not witness his own death through the eyes of the copy.

John wrote:
> As I've said many many times before the 2 "perfect" copies are no longer
> even close to being perfect, one is going through a traumatic experience 
> and
> one is not.

Okay, so if we assume your meaning of the word "perfect" which is "same 
brain structure, same subjective experience at all times" then how do you 
propose to revive a frozen brain?

As soon as you make a copy from the frozen brain the copy will not be 
"perfect" because, according to your definition, both will have different 
subjective experience. One feels nothing, the other feels something.

So can we at least agree that it's impossible to make a frozen brain and a 
copy "perfect?"


>> you say that POV of the original and the copy would be the same, then why
>> do you admit that original would be jealous?

> If two brains are identical then they are doing the same thing,

Not true. You could make an atomically precise copy of me and my clone and I 
could be doing different things.


> if they are
> doing the same thing they are producing the same mind.

If both of them share the same subjective experience only means just that 
and nothing else. The argument that "same subjective experience -> same 
mind" is as valid as "I watch a movie with a friend -> we become one mind".


> In your thought
> experiment the two brains are no longer identical, they are doing 
> different
> things, they are producing different minds, they have diverged. Is that
> really difficult to understand?
>
>>And that's where we differ.
>
> You believe that nature can recycle all the atoms in your body every month
> or so but if nanotechnology were to try to do the same thing something 
> would
> be missing, that something can only be a unique soul.


Wait, I didn't say anything close to that. I only said that recycling of 
atoms is a natural occurrence of Moravec transfer, that's all. It would be 
perfectly legal to perform Moravec transfer by means of nanomachines. It's 
the destructive uploading that is the problem.

Slawomir 



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list