[extropy-chat] cell phone usage distance ... minimizing exposure

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Fri Jul 28 21:16:11 UTC 2006


On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:31:54PM -0400, Martin Striz wrote:

> EM signals at mobile phone frequencies are relatively harmless.  DNA
> absorbs maximmally at 260 nm, the UV range, so if you're worried about
> cancer, it's the EM radiation coming down from the sky that should
> concern you.

You don't know what the nonthermal effects are. The effect is not huge
(orelse we'd see in the statistics) but it doesn't mean it isn't there.
Especially, long-term.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20060728/159ef116/attachment.bin>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list