[extropy-chat] Peak Oil news
lcorbin at tsoft.com
Wed Mar 8 14:41:56 UTC 2006
> At 08:10 AM 3/8/2006, Lee Corbin wrote:
> > I venture to say that anyone who's studied Gold's fine book
> > will significantly change his odds more towards the abiotic
> > theory, (even if he retains probability at less than
> > fifty percent).
> This can only be true on average for rational people if they do not believe
> your claim.
Well, I suppose that we can dismiss them out of hand at once.
> If I believed you [that's more like it] that my odds
> would go up after reading the book, I would just raise
> my odds in anticipation of that, even if I never read
> the book.
Then, having read my note, you must consider yourself therefore
more enlightened. You are welcome.
> If I am rational, I must expect that reading a book arguing
> for a position on some subject will be as likely to move me
> away from that position as to move me closer.
Another big if :-)
No. Surely in all seriousness you must admit that the
credibility that you extend me might prove to be quite
a bit lower than the credibility that you extend someone
like Gold after having read a book you can't help but
find extremely impressive.
> (More precisely my expected value of my future
> expectation must equal my current expectation.)
While that is quite right, it might be interpreted by
many to mean that you shouldn't bother consulting
original sources at all.
More information about the extropy-chat