[extropy-chat] Intellectual influence
asa at nada.kth.se
Mon Oct 9 22:21:29 UTC 2006
Neil H. wrote:
> Interesting stuff. A few things I wonder about:
> * If you use the "influences" and "influenced by" information in the
> Wikipedia templates, does it have similar results?
I didn't know the Big W had that feature, and now I'm itching to try. Just
simple pattern matching in a python script and I could make a crawler to
harvest the graph. I just have to figure out the best way of download a
copy of the Wikipedia to play with locally. Anybody who has done it?
> * How similar are the results if you simply rely on which person articles
> have wiki links to each other?
My guess is that the influence links will have a higher signal-to-noise
ratio, especially since many person references relate more to interactions
and family than intellectual links.
It also depends on how well you can disambiguate persons from other
articles. I didn't see any "person" category, which means it is likely
that it will be tricky to automatically determine whether a link is
another person (I'd love to have a good named entity reference detector
for English to integrate in my software - in Swedish capitalisation can do
a surprisingly decent job, but it fails for English). Even if we just
accept philosopher category pages it will be somewhat messy. Still, in the
long run every link is sacred: it contains a deliberate relation to
another document we can mine if we can just dig out enough context around
Why am I looking at this problem in the first place? Let's just say the
Future of Humanity Institute has a few empty walls screaming for beautiful
visualisations of the world and our understanding of it.
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
Philosophy Faculty of Oxford University
More information about the extropy-chat