[extropy-chat] Resource Dispersal
eugen at leitl.org
Thu Sep 7 09:24:52 UTC 2006
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 05:04:03PM -0700, A B wrote:
> For the sake of this question, lets assume that the first
> super-intelligent mind is derived purely from AI research (ie. there
That's overwhelmingly unlikely. Classical AI research is sterile.
You would have to bet on computational neuroscience, which is strongly
> aren't yet any cyborgs running around) and that this occurs in the
I'm not sure there will be any cyborgs running around, ever.
> relatively near future (~10 years from now or less). Let's assume that
We'd be lucky to have the hardware by 2040, or so. But having the hardware
is just a potential. It may sit there utilized suboptimally for several
> it is "friendly" and pursues altruistic goals. Do you guys believe
Why should it be friendly?
> that the AI, acting consistently with "friendliness", would
> "peacefully" enforce an equal distribution of resources (eg. energy,
It's good that you put that in scare-quotes.
> matter, etc.) among all conscious beings on earth? Or, would you guess
> that the AI would feel compelled for any reason to preserve something
> similar to the weighted economic/ethical system that we have today (in
> the Democratic countries at least). (Note: I'm not yet indicating my
> preference on this matter, I'm just curious about what some Extropians
I think if you've made a naturally superintelligent system, and there is
no possibility to hitch a ride on its ascent, you're instant fossil record
(metaphorically -- you'd need sediments for the fossil record).
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the extropy-chat