[ExI] Bayesian epistemology

[Russell Wallace]

On 8/6/07, Jef Allbright <jef at jefallbright.net> wrote:
> Strange.  I thought I disagreed with several of your specifics.

That's why I used the phrase "consistent with" - I didn't reply line
by line because it seemed to me that would be likely to miss the
point, but there were a few cases where I would have said "er yes, you
have (given a reasonable interpretation of the terms) correctly
pointed out _why_ such and such isn't a matter of probability" etc :)