[extropy-chat] what is probability?
gts_2000 at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 2 04:17:21 UTC 2007
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:54:42 -0500, Ben Goertzel <ben at goertzel.org> wrote:
> The most consistent interpretational approach, I believe, is a fusion
> of the Subjective Theory and Logical Theory as enabled by Cox's
Thanks. Interesting! I know nothing of Cox's theorem, and so I'll need to
study it before I can comment.
In the meantime I should correct something I wrote earlier about the
I wrote, "[the logical theory] will be seen as either epistemic or
objective depending on one's conviction concerning the alleged objective
neo-platonic reality of logic."
I meant something more like: "[the logical theory] can be seen either as
subjective or objective depending on one's conviction concerning the
alleged objective neo-platonic reality of logic, but in either case it can
be considered epistemic."
More information about the extropy-chat