[extropy-chat] Easter Island not a human-created disaster?
eugen at leitl.org
Sun Jan 7 12:52:31 UTC 2007
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:41:41AM +0000, BillK wrote:
> So, to sum up, this article claims that the evidence shows that a
> plague of rats ate all the palm seeds and caused the deforestation.
Of course rats spread via the human ships. Perturbing ecological
systems by introducing alien species (rats, goats, etc) is only a
yet another mechanism by which humans alter existing ecosystems,
typically to their own disadvantage.
> The human population started later and was much smaller than previous
> estimates up to the time that European contact provided diseases and
IIRC, the estimates were made on the base of human labor required
to build and maintain the statues and the pedestals.
> slave-trading that finished the islanders off.
I'm not saying this study is bogus, but I'd like to see more
evidence than just this isolated study.
> Not much room for evolutionary psychology in this scenario.
Assuming you're correct in this particular case, do you think
all the other cases in 'Collapse' are similiarly dubious or bogus?
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the extropy-chat