[ExI] A Cyborg or a transhuman ?
natasha at natasha.cc
Sat Jul 21 13:20:27 UTC 2007
At 05:25 PM 7/20/2007, Jef wrote:
>On 7/20/07, nvitamore at austin.rr.com <nvitamore at austin.rr.com> wrote:
> > Can anyone answer the million dollar question:
> > What is the difference between a cyborg and a transhum?
>A transhum is a what you get when a cyborg doesn't know the words?
haha. This is good!
>But seriously, folks...
>A cyborg, or cybernetic organism, is an organism composed of
>integrated artificial and natural systems. So present-day, low-level
>cyborgs include humans with cochlear implants, hearing aids, cardiac
>or neural pacemakers, eyeglasses, etc.
>"Transhuman", on the other hand, is more a reference to a future point
>on a trajectory beyond present concepts of humanity than anything that
>can be precisely specified.
I wonder if it not more fundamentally related to "human nature" (the
elephant in the room). I was just listening to Kevin Kelly's talk at
TED and how he approaches the idea from a theory of technology and
"hacking" as an essential nature all life forms.
But I agree that the transhuman is a "becoming" and each cyborg stage
is a fata compli.
- just musing.
PhD Candidate, <http://www.planetary-collegium.net/about/>Planetary
Situated in the Faculty of Technology, School of Computing,
Communications and Electronics,
University of Plymouth, England
<http://www.transhumanist.biz/>Transhumanist Arts & Culture
If you draw a circle in the sand and study only what's inside the
circle, then that is a closed-system perspective. If you study what
is inside the circle and everything outside the circle, then that is
an open system perspective. - Buckminster Fuller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat