[ExI] State of California supporting Bussard fusion research?
eugen at leitl.org
Wed Jul 25 10:11:56 UTC 2007
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:09:39PM -0700, giovanni santost wrote:
> I'm Giovanni, I have just joined the list, very interesting
> Well, even if I'm a physicist, I'm not an expert in nuclear fusion (my
> field is gravitational waves) but ITER mentioned in the article
> reference in Neil's email is the international effort (and really the
> only game in town) to achieve controlled nuclear fusion, and there are
> good reasons why it costs billions instead of millions... Bussard is
> legit but he seems cut off from the fusion community somehow (he has
> his own private scientific firm). He is not a crackpot but maybe he is
> a loose cannon or something....
He looks like a maverick. He might succeed, then he might not.
He certainly has no trouble raising private money for his latest
project. Unlike tokamak or inertial confinement his stuff is cheap.
> but controlled nuclear fusion would be really nice so good luck to
> him....(and Schwarzenegger).
If you had 50 megabucks to burn, would you rather spend it on
renewables, or on fusion (which has absorbed many gigabucks,
and has not even produced a break-even)?
For all practical purposes solar is free fusion power, and
wireless to boot. All you need is cheap enough antennas.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat