[extropy-chat] What should survive and why?.

Lee Corbin lcorbin at rawbw.com
Wed May 2 16:04:35 UTC 2007


John Clark had written

> Heartland... wrote:
> 
> > Just because I-now thinks I-before survived does not cause "I-before
> > survived" statement to be true.

and then John (understandably) criticized the statement (from the way
that he would naturally interpret those statements.  I offered a criticism
of both the way that the above was written, and I made the serious
error of using an unoriginal joke:

Slawomir responds:

> Lee:
>> One needs to phrase "I-now" and "I-before" much much more carefully
>> to avoid misunderstanding. I can see why John got upset at that phrase.
>> But if you had written instead, "Just because an entity legally known
>> as Slawomir the High Priest at time 1 believes that Slawomir the etc.
>> at time 0 survived, does not make it true".
> 
> That joke has gone stale a long time ago, don't you think? Actually, a good joke 
> has at least some truth in it. This one had none, as you know. Perhaps you don't.

My sincere apologies---and my even deeper apologies to the list for
a  bad attempt at levity that derailed serious thought on the part of my
discussion partner.

Please allow me to rephase:

One needs to phrase "I-now" and "I-before" much much more carefully
to avoid misunderstanding. I can see why John got upset at that phrase.
But if you had written instead, "Just because an entity legally known
and univerally recognized as Mr. X at time 1 believes that entity universally
recognized at time 0 survived, does not make it true".

Do you or do you not concede that this would have been clearer, and
would have very possibly prevented John Clark from misunderstanding you?

Lee




More information about the extropy-chat mailing list