[ExI] Slavery Now and in the Past (was: Health system, again)
fauxever at sprynet.com
Sun Apr 13 18:32:58 UTC 2008
From: "Rafal Smigrodzki" <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com>
To: "ExI chat list" <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Olga Bourlin <fauxever at sprynet.com>
>> (in answer to a previous post of Lee Corbin's) Your remark about
>> "institutions dead nearly 150 years ago" does not take into account de
>> jure segregation that existed in parts of the USA into the 1960s, and
>> many instances of de facto segregation since then. Those institutions
>> are interrelated - and not all dead.
> ### But given the context of this discussion - note that the Jim Crow laws
> were enacted by, guess what, the government. So the high likelihood that
> immoral laws would be enacted because of regulatory capture is another
> argument *against* the government. In case of slavery, regulatory capture
> was achieved by a minority of wealthy landowners who maintained the system
> long after it became unpopular among the majority of Southern population.
> Slavery wouldn't have survived as long as it did if not for the existence
> of the US government.
If you are counting in the opinion of the slaves themselves, perhaps a case
could be made that slavery was unpopular - but slavery was quite accepted
and popular by "the majority of [White] Southern population." (I suppose
apologists for the Confederacy would like to have one think otherwise ...).
And it wasn't only the "minority of wealthy landowners" who profited from
slavery- early America's economy grew and prospered greatly from slavery
(free labor! free labor! how can any economic system beat that?) .
In so-called third-world countries where one finds slavery in the world
these days, one also finds weak and ineffectual governments. What does this
say about the role of government? What does this indicate about leaving
things to the whimsies of "the people?" (IMHO, without the intervention of
some sort of human rights legislation, one cannot make a good case for
leaving things to "human nature" ... can you?)
>> Not that they're exempt from condemnation, but many "non-western
>> out there now don't pretend to be democracies - we USAmericans are (and
>> were) supposed to be a democracy. That put us then (and puts us now) at
>> different, and higher, standard.
>> I am an immigrant (and naturalized citizen) of the USA. I like it here.
>> can't think of any other place I'd rather live. I like the idea of
>> of nations" that we have going here. I would like to see this country
>> strive for greatness - but, in looking at the past, you're not going to
>> it (IMHO).
>> To garble a phrase Quentin Crisp used in The Naked Civil Servant: There
>> no great shining country (and no shining city on the hill, either -
>> in Ronald Reagan movies).
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> Rafal Smigrodzki, MD-PhD
> Chief Clinical Officer,
> Gencia Corporation
> 706 B Forest St.
> Charlottesville, VA 22903
> tel: (434) 295-4800
> fax: (434) 295-4951
> This electronic message transmission contains information from the
> biotechnology firm of Gencia Corporation which may be confidential or
> privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use
> of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have
> received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by
> telephone (434-295-4800) or by electronic mail
> (fportell at genciabiotech.com) immediately.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
More information about the extropy-chat