[ExI] The Dogs of Immortality
phoenix at ugcs.caltech.edu
Fri Aug 1 17:45:26 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:32:53PM -0700, Lee Corbin wrote:
> Well, hell yes! Who would give a damn about the murdered
> woman in that case? People as well as our legal system, understand
I would think such a committed anti-statist as yourself would be more
wary of sending messages to cops that they could get away with violating
> But what I don't understand is this. Usually when the jury reaches
> the wrong verdict, as they did in the Rodney King case against
> the police officers--- can you believe it, in the first trial the jury
> acquited the police officers? --- the government simply retries the
> case in another jurisdiction. So why wasn't O. J. Simpson tried
Well, there is this minor thing in the Constitution about no double
> again for, oh, violating someone's civil rights, or engaging in a
Well, perhaps the civil rights laws (which were used to re-try the King
officers in federal courts) aren't written so as to apply to private
individuals or something. Wikipedia says the federal trial focused
more on training than the videotape.
> conspiracy, or, (when the government gets desperate) "attempting
Need people to have a conspiracy.
> to evade a guilty verdict", or whatever it takes to convict?
...now yo're being silly.
-xx- Damien X-)
More information about the extropy-chat