[ExI] Vinge finally cracks the NYT
kanzure at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 06:22:39 UTC 2008
On Thursday 28 August 2008, Daniel Grisinger wrote:
> > 'Make' is a brand by Make Magazine and O'Reilly and friends.
> > They've leeched on to these communities with an iron fist. Be
> > careful with them .. while some of the content is good and
> > interesting, it's just them being a giant filter with first mover
> > advantage.
> This is absolutely true. And it won't be the first time that a
> trademark has been co-opted by a community with no regard for the
> commercial intentions of its coiner. Everybody I know who is working
> on their own projects in the space calls him or herself a "maker".
> So far as I can tell, they are using the term the same way that we
> used hacker as the open source movement started. But what is
> important, I think, is that this is something distinct from the
> traditional open source software movement. Bits will make a bigger
> difference over time than atoms, but atoms are the critical next
> step, imo.
'Center for Bits and Atoms' has found itself a good name.
It's actually Gershenfeld's lab. He writes stuff like:
> From this combination of passion and inventiveness I began to get a
> sense that what these students are really doing is reinventing
> literacy. Literacy in the modern sense emerged in the Renaissance as
> mastery of the liberal arts. This is liberal in the sense of
> liberation, not politically liberal. The trivium and the quadrivium
> represented the available means of expression. Since then we've
> boiled that down to just reading and writing, but the means have
> changed quite a bit since the Renaissance. In a very real sense
> post-digital literacy now includes 3D machining and microcontroller
> programming. I've even been taking my twins, now 6, in to use MIT's
> workshops; they talk about going to MIT to make things they think of
> rather than going to a toy store to buy what someone else has
> designed. The World Bank is trying to close the digital divide by
> bringing IT to the masses. The message coming back for the fab labs
> is that rather than IT for the masses the real story is IT
> development for the masses. Rather than the digital divide, the real
> story is that there's a fabrication and an instrumentation divide.
> Computing for the rest of the world only secondarily means browsing
> the Web; it demands rich means of input and output to interface
> computing to their worlds. There was an amazing moment as I was
> talking to these Army generals about how the most profound
> implication of emerging technology for them might not lie in
> designing a better weapon to win a war, but rather in giving more
> people something else to do. So we're now at a cusp where personal
> fabrication is poised to reinvent literacy in the developed world,
> and to engage the intellectual capacity of the rest of the world.
> > RepRap jumped the gun and lied to its community about universal
> > self-replication, and even lied to the NY Times. While it's an
> > awesome project, and I'm meeting an increasing number of people who
> > are aware of the project, it's at heart a rapid prototyper that
> > doesn't manufacture itself completely. Oh well. People will assume
> > it's something else .. which is good, I guess, but it kind of makes
> > them think that the real effort has already been done, i.e., to
> > actually get self-replication, when it hasn't really.
> This is also true. But I don't think that's what's going to stick as
> the story people remember. I think people will remember that they
> built a machine out of instructions on the internet and that it could
> make its own parts.
But it coudn't .. :-(
Not sure that it matters what stories the people remember, I'm
interested in making it happen, although I'm sure the story will be a
good one as well.
> > BTW, don't you find it odd the lack of schematics for printing
> > presses on the internet? I looked into this and it turns out that
> > Gutenberg immediately went into commercial businesses. Huh.
> I had never noticed until I just went to google it. And what few
> pages are there appear to quickly mire away into dead links and bit
Shouldn't every kid in school be building these things in their history
class? Or literature class.
More information about the extropy-chat