[ExI] Cost of synfuel was Air-powered cars
hkhenson at rogers.com
Thu Jun 12 05:25:12 UTC 2008
At 02:41 AM 6/11/2008, Stefano Vaj wrote:
>Thus, we have to profit more extensively and directly from the very
>process that has originally produced "natural" oil and gas, namely
>nuclear fusion, be it in artificial reactors
It's not entirely obvious that fusion reactors on earth make a lot of
sense. They might, but tapping the natural one could be a lot easier.
>or by going to space and
>getting it from "natural" reactors, i.e., stars.
It depends a great deal on how the economy is organized. If everyone
uploads and only travels by optical fiber, an energy budged of a
hundred watts per person might be plenty. It's a very different
situation where people want to eat well and travel long distances.
>Then you can have all
>the oil and gas you like, but without waiting for the geological ages
>natural production involves. Not that you would need much, once the
>energy is already there.
Assuming things didn't change a lot, about 1/3 of our energy is
transport fuels. That's huge, but well within what you can do with
More information about the extropy-chat