[ExI] Wernicke's aphasia and the CRA.

Gordon Swobe gts_2000 at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 12 20:20:45 UTC 2009


> You still refuse to acknowledge what
> critics have shown for many years: the English monoglot
> speaker is the functional equivalent of a single neuron

Perhps you missed it Damien it but that reply of the systems critics was answered many years ago.

In the reply, the man internalizes the rule book and steps outside the room. Different picture, same symbol grounding problem.

The larger point of course is that really does not matter which metaphor we use. The CR thought experiment illustrates the symbol grounding problem:

"The Symbol Grounding Problem is related to the problem of how words (symbols) get their meanings, and hence to the problem of what meaning itself really is. The problem of meaning is in turn related to the problem of consciousness, or how it is that mental states are meaningful. According to a widely held theory of cognition, "computationalism," cognition (i.e., thinking) is just a form of computation. But computation in turn is just formal symbol manipulation: symbols are manipulated according to rules that are based on the symbols' shapes, not their meanings."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol_grounding


-gts


      



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list