[ExI] big dumb booster question
wingcat at pacbell.net
Tue Apr 27 21:35:23 UTC 2010
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
> > ...On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes
> > How well, and how long, would they last on Venus?
> Hmmm, don't know about that.
Can you ask?
> > What about sundiving - let a probe send back telemetry as
> > long as possible?...
> That is a good possibility. The outer layer chars to
> pretty much pure
> carbon, which is really good for high temperatures.
So how does one submit these ideas to DARPA? Is there a
site, or can you do it through your contacts?
> > Do they stand up to volcanoes well?
> Drop it in thru the ash? Of course it wouldn't
> survive any impact, but I
> think you had in mind having it send chemical composition
> and temperature
> data before impact? That's an idea.
Yeah. I was thinking to send it in through the magma of an
active one mid-eruption, actually. Let it swim upstream
(where "upstream" is down: go in through a flow that's
being pushed upward) as far as it can get.
[re: use as artillery]
> The problem we never could solve is that it would look to
> the commies like a
> nuclear attack. So we put in the Disadvantage column
> "might trigger
> unlimited nuclear war" with the parenthetical comment:
> (bad). We had all
> seen Ghost Busters. So it was tested but never put
> into production.
So don't use it against a nuclear power. For instance, if
we have to invade Iran in 5 years or so, it might be
useful. Or reserve it for use in conjunction with regular
war, so it'll be obviously non-nuclear (because we're not
sending our troops through land we've just irradiated, and
they know it).
More information about the extropy-chat