[ExI] transhumanist as a philosophy
giulio at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 13:48:53 UTC 2010
We do have major texts. But they propose different interpretations of
transhumanism, fundamentally compatible (I think) but with important
differences in interpretation and focus.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
> a perspective, a set of interpretative principles and principles of action,
> tends be regarded as a *formal philosophy* only after it has been canonized
> in one or more major texts.
More information about the extropy-chat