[ExI] Psi in a major science journal, J. Personality and Social Psychology
hkeithhenson at gmail.com
Fri Oct 22 11:02:53 UTC 2010
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 10:54 AM, Keith Henson wrote:
>>> > Actually, this is just factually incorrect. Me, personally, I have
>>> > read
>>> > dozens of papers that try to analyze how it works. They may not be
>>> > good
>>> > explanations, but they are attempts, at least.
>> I can't imagine reading one, much less dozens.
> By an amazing coincidence, that's exactly what all these fundamentalists in
> Texas say when told about papers analyzing how evolution works.
A friend of mine read the book of Oahspe cover to cover. That may be
worst than reading dozens of papers on psi. Here is a random sample
Incidentally, we see the results of evolution all around us. Psi is a
lot harder to see. The fact that gambling establishments are
profitable indicates it is uncommon/weak/unreliable if it exists at
More information about the extropy-chat