[ExI] Precog PCs

Stefano Vaj stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 22:28:33 UTC 2010

On 24 October 2010 22:03, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
> The implication is that any psi experiment is always subject jointly to at
> least the influence of the agent or subject (who should be double blind) and
> the experimenter (who should be blind to the target).
> With a program devised to "guess" (whatever that means for an algorithm--do
> you throw in some sampling of quantum noise?), any significant effect could
> always be attributed to the desires of the experimenter.

You mean that the experimenter would influence psychokinetically the
random generation of the "guesses"?!

 What if the program is diffused, installed and run randomly and
unpredictably, e.g., in a virus-like fashion?

Stefano Vaj

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list