[ExI] [transvisioncc] (Mis)understanding Transhumanism: TransVision 2010 Presentation by Miriam Ji Sun

Thu Sep 9 04:09:53 UTC 2010

Well said.

Thank you.

Natasha

 <http://www.natasha.cc/> Natasha Vita-More

  _____  

From: transvisioncc at googlegroups.com [mailto:transvisioncc at googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Philippe Van Nedervelde
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:57 PM
To: transvisioncc at googlegroups.com
Cc: ExI chat list; World Transhumanist Association Discussion List;
extrobritannia at yahoogroups.com; euro-transhumanists at googlegroups.com;
cosmic-engineers at googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [transvisioncc] (Mis)understanding Transhumanism: TransVision
2010 Presentation by Miriam Ji Sun

When outsiders read this, it will give them the impression that
transhumanism either is or has become a motley, disorganized grab-bag of
unclearly overlapping philosophies and ideologies and/or that the word
'transhumanism' is or has become a signifier so unclear / imprecise /
too-much-encompassing in its meaning as to be or have become effectively
useless... as a label... or otherwise. 

That's a problem. Certainly for this here text... and possibly also for the
disparate collection of meanings still referred to by the probably
increasingly inaccurate or at least mis-representative signifier
'transhumanism'.

"H+" works pretty well as a symbol for it, but generally fails as a
replacement for the word 'transhumanism' in discourse, certainly for
discourse involving outsiders.

Does this suggest it is (high) time for some intra-H+ semantic clean-up...
to (re-)clarify what 'transhumanism' does (not) mean and stand for? Perhaps
the meaning(s) should revert to meaning(s) closer to its roots? 

~ Philip ~ 

P.S. Natasha, is your talk on Deconstructing Transhumanism up somewhere?
URL? I'd love to read / see / hear it.

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Giulio Prisco <giulio at gmail.com> wrote:

(Mis)understanding Transhumanism: TransVision 2010 Presentation by Miriam Ji
Sun
http://transvision2010.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/misunderstanding-transhumani
sm-transvision-2010-presentation-by-miriam-ji-sun/

Transhumansism is a complex and still evolving philosophy that cuts
across a variety of philosophies and ways of life and even
incorporated views from its critics. Therefore, transhumanism can not
be understood in a one-dimensional way. When trying to interpret and
understand transhumanism many people tend to only focus on specific
aspects that also relate to familiar concepts. However, transhumanism
is full of seeming contradictions if taking commonly known thought
schools, philosophies and ideologies as basis.

It is neither modern nor post-modern, but it nonetheless contains
elements of "grand narratives" and "deconstructionism". It is future
oriented but has its roots in the past enlightenment era.
Transhumanism is individualistic but global and secular but also
spiritual.

My argumentation would be that transhumanism should be better viewed
as a new concept with new arrangements, interpretations and
standpoints than in comparison to already known concepts. It is also
important to look at the whole picture and interconnections between
the different elements that make up the core of transhumanist thought.
If this is not done, one can easily get to contradicting conclusions
like stating that transhumanism is pluralistic, multicultural and
social democratic while at the same time "fascist", atheist as well as
religious, technology-utopian and at the same time concerned with
existential risks, ancient, modern and post-modern. Also other
criticism like transhumanism being male-dominated can not be seen as
allegation: it is open for everyone, but it is of course related to a
rather specific set of interests, but should we force people to join
in order to improve the quota?

My final thoughts will deal with the question if transhumanism may be
better understood from an Asian philosophical tradition that is better
able to incorporate seeming contradictions (or not even seeing this as
contradiction) that from a Western perspective?

As a conclusion I would say that that is not one "transhumanism" since
there is no real code or even doctrine. Even the views about commonly
shared ideas like HET, life extension, cryonics 'uploading', AI,
risks, 'posthumans' and the concept of the 'singularity' are varying.
Thus I would say that transhumanists go deeper into thinking about the
future than some other foresighters (especially those focussing on
rather shot-term business or policy issues), share a common view that
the human condition can be improved through means of science and
technology, that science is the best available method to understand
the world in the context of engineering purposes and technology can
and should be furthered, developed and actively supported to improve
the life and living conditions of humanity (and the environment humans
live in).

Transhumansim can be seen as a new dimension that crosses through
(nearly) all political views and societal choices and thus even people
with very different social or political views (e.g. entrepreneurs and
socialists as well as believers and atheists) can embrace
transhumanism.

Miriam Ji Sun is a professional strategic foresight researcher and
futurist volunteer being active in NGOs and several foresight-related
networks. She has obtained her phD in sociology with an
interdisciplinary-oriented thesis about robotics and AI and did her
master thesis in political science on a topic in biopolitics. Now Ji
Sun is specialising in emerging technologies (e.g. NBIC, biomedical
engineering, Human Enhancement Technologies (HET), advanced robotics
and AI, synthetic biology), future issues (e.g. megatrends, weak
signals, Grand Challenges), ethical, legal and social perception of
emerging technologies, vision assessment, transhumanism and foresight
methodology.

TransVision 2010 is a global transhumanist conference and community
convention, organized by several transhumanist activists, groups and
organizations, under the executive leadership of the Italian
Transhumanist Association (AIT) and with the collaboration of an
Advisory Board. The event will take place on October 22, 23 and 24,
2010 in Milan, Italy with many options for remote online access.

Register now http://transvision2010.wordpress.com/registration/

post links to Twitter, your blogs and websites, and add your name to
the TransVision 2010 Facebook page.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transvisioncc" group.
To post to this group, send email to transvisioncc at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transvisioncc+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
<mailto:transvisioncc%2Bunsubscribe at googlegroups.com> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transvisioncc?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transvisioncc" group.
To post to this group, send email to transvisioncc at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transvisioncc+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transvisioncc?hl=en.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100908/8c7c06be/attachment.html>